Sessions Samuel Y, Lee Philip R
University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2008 Apr;33(2):155-97. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2007-052.
Government already pays for more than half of U.S. health care costs, and nearly all universal health insurance proposals assume continued government involvement through tax subsidies and other means. The question of what specific taxes could be used to finance universal coverage is, however, seldom carefully examined, in part due to efforts by health care reform proponents to downplay tax issues. In this article we undertake such an examination. We argue that the challenges of relying on taxes for universal coverage are even greater than is generally appreciated, but that they can nevertheless be met. A proposal to fund a universal health insurance voucher system with a value-added tax illustrates issues that would arise for tax-financed plans in general and provides a broad framework for a bipartisan approach to universal coverage. We discuss significant problems that such an approach would face and suggest solutions. We outline a long-term political and legislative strategy for enacting universal coverage that draws upon precedents set by comparable legislative initiatives, including tax reform and Medicare. The results are an improved understanding of the relationship between systemic health care finance reform and taxation and a politically realistic plan for universal coverage that employs undisguised taxes.
美国政府已经支付了超过一半的医疗保健费用,而且几乎所有的全民医疗保险提案都假定政府会通过税收补贴及其他方式继续参与其中。然而,究竟可以用哪些具体税收来为全民医保筹资这一问题却很少得到认真审视,部分原因在于医疗保健改革的支持者们力图淡化税收问题。在本文中,我们将进行这样一项审视。我们认为,依靠税收来实现全民医保所面临的挑战比人们普遍认识到的还要大,但尽管如此这些挑战仍能得到应对。一项用增值税为全民医疗保险代金券系统筹资的提案,阐明了一般税收筹资计划将会出现的问题,并为两党合作实现全民医保提供了一个广泛的框架。我们讨论了这种方法将会面临的重大问题并提出了解决方案。我们勾勒出一项旨在通过借鉴包括税收改革和医疗保险在内的类似立法举措所开创的先例来颁布全民医保的长期政治和立法战略。其结果是,增进了对系统性医疗保健筹资改革与税收之间关系的理解,并形成了一项采用明税形式的、在政治上切实可行的全民医保计划。