Gerbault O, Arrouvel C, Servant J M, Revol M, Banzet P
Laboratoire de Microchirurgie de Paris VII (Saint-Louis, Lariboisière.
Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 1998 Feb;43(1):27-39.
The aim of this work was to study the possibilities and limits of the vascular microanastomoses with VCS microclips. VCS Microclips are a new mechanical anastomotic device, allowing a single operator to perform anastomoses without microsutures. The two arcuate limbs of the titanium microclips do not penetrate the vascular intima. The microclip anastomosis technique is based on symmetric eversion of the vessel walls, facilitated by everting forceps. We studied the medium and small Autosuture VCS microclips on different vessels ranging from 0.3 to 2 millimeters in diameter: aorta, carotid artery, femoral artery and femoral vein. Thirty nine end-to-end or end-to-side anastomoses were performed on Wistar rats. These anastomoses were performed by a single operator without the use of sutures. Patency was studied by the "empty and refill" test immediately and at two months. Histologic analysis of the anastomosis was performed at two months (hematein-eosin and orcein stains on longitudinal sections). Four out of thirty nine anastomoses were occluded during the 15 minutes following clamp release. Failure was always due to a technical error and occurred during the first trials. The thirty five other anastomoses were patent immediately and at two months post-operatively, except for the by-pass which was not viable. These anastomoses were still patent 30 minutes post-operatively. Light microscopy analysis confirmed that the microclip extremities did not penetrate the lumen, although the internal media was usually very thin at the level of the microclip jaws, especially for the smallest vessels. For vessels larger than 1 mm in diameter, the microclip extremities were usually outside the internal elastic lamina. No anastomotic aneurysm was found. Vascular healing was comparable with microsutures at 2 months. Microvascular anastomoses performed with microclips have numerous advantages, compared to usual microsutures: they are two to three times quicker, they can be performed step by step without turning the clamp and they can be performed with the right or left hand. There is theoretically no thrombogenic risk. The drawbacks are the need for complementary training and the cost of microclips which is five to six times that of sutures. End-to-side anastomoses of small vessels are more difficult than end-to-end anastomoses. The recipient vessels must be larger than 1.5 mm in diameter, otherwise the anastomosis may become stenosed. Microclips are especially useful to save time, i.e. for multiple anastomoses and for anastomoses of vessels larger than 1 millimeter in diameter. Some modifications of the material could allow vascular or hollow organ anastomoses with endoscopic assistance.
这项工作的目的是研究使用VCS微型夹进行血管显微吻合的可能性和局限性。VCS微型夹是一种新型机械吻合装置,使单个操作者无需显微缝合即可进行吻合。钛微型夹的两个弧形臂不会穿透血管内膜。微型夹吻合技术基于血管壁的对称外翻,外翻镊子有助于实现这一点。我们研究了直径在0.3至2毫米之间的不同血管(主动脉、颈动脉、股动脉和股静脉)上的中号和小号自动缝合VCS微型夹。在Wistar大鼠上进行了39例端端或端侧吻合。这些吻合由单个操作者在不使用缝线的情况下完成。立即以及在两个月时通过“排空和再充盈”试验研究通畅情况。在两个月时对吻合处进行组织学分析(纵切片上的苏木精-伊红和orcein染色)。在松开夹子后的15分钟内,39例吻合中有4例闭塞。失败总是由于技术失误,且发生在最初的试验中。其他35例吻合在术后立即以及两个月时均通畅,但旁路不可行。这些吻合在术后3分钟时仍然通畅。光学显微镜分析证实,微型夹末端未穿透管腔,尽管在内膜水平处,微型夹钳口处的中膜通常非常薄,对于最小的血管尤其如此。对于直径大于1毫米的血管,微型夹末端通常位于内弹性膜之外。未发现吻合性动脉瘤。在两个月时,血管愈合情况与显微缝合相当。与常规显微缝合相比,使用微型夹进行微血管吻合有许多优点:速度快两到三倍,可以一步一步进行,无需转动夹子,并且左右手均可操作。理论上没有血栓形成风险。缺点是需要进行补充培训,且微型夹的成本是缝线的五到六倍。小血管的端侧吻合比端端吻合更困难。受体血管直径必须大于1.5毫米,否则吻合可能会变窄。微型夹对于节省时间特别有用,即用于多次吻合以及直径大于1毫米的血管的吻合。对该材料进行一些改进可能会在内镜辅助下实现血管或中空器官的吻合。