Suppr超能文献

通过细胞质和细胞核显微注射对与微(μ)和核定位信号-微(NLS-μ)凝聚的质粒DNA的核递送和核内转录进行评估:与聚-L-赖氨酸的比较研究

Evaluation of the nuclear delivery and intra-nuclear transcription of plasmid DNA condensed with micro (mu) and NLS-micro by cytoplasmic and nuclear microinjection: a comparative study with poly-L-lysine.

作者信息

Akita Hidetaka, Tanimoto Mitsuhide, Masuda Tomoya, Kogure Kentaro, Hama Susumu, Ninomiya Keiko, Futaki Shiroh, Harashima Hideyoshi

机构信息

Laboratory for Molecular Design of Pharmaceutics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.

出版信息

J Gene Med. 2006 Feb;8(2):198-206. doi: 10.1002/jgm.839.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The efficient nuclear delivery of plasmid DNA (pDNA) is essential for the development of a promising non-viral gene vector. In an attempt to achieve nuclear delivery, NLS-mu, a novel pDNA condenser, was prepared. This consists of mu, a highly potent polypeptide for condensing the pDNA, and a SV40 T antigen-derived nuclear localization signal (NLS(SV40)).

METHODS

The utility of NLS-mu was assessed in terms of green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression after cytoplasmic and nuclear microinjection of GFP-encoding pDNA along with the transfection, and compared with mu and poly-L-lysine (PLL). Trans-gene expression after cytoplasmic microinjection was affected by the efficiencies of nuclear transfer and following intra-nuclear transcription. To evaluate the nuclear transfer process separately, we introduced a parameter, a nuclear transfer score (NT score), which was calculated as the trans-gene expression after cytoplasmic microinjection divided by that after nuclear microinjection.

RESULTS

As expected, the rank order of trans-gene expression after the transfection and cytoplasmic microinjection was NLS-mu > mu > PLL. However, the calculated NT scores were unexpectedly ranked as mu = NLS-mu > PLL, suggesting that mu, and not NLS(SV40), is responsible for the nuclear delivery of pDNA. In addition, confocal images of rhodamine-labeled pDNA indicated that pDNA condensed with mu and NLS-mu was delivered as a condensed form. In comparing the nuclear transcription, the rank order of trans-gene expression after nuclear microinjection was PLL = NLS-mu > mu, suggesting that intra-nuclear transcription is inhibited by efficient condensation by mu, and is avoided by the attachment of NLS(SV40).

CONCLUSIONS

Collectively, NLS-mu, which consists of chimeric functions, is an excellent DNA condenser, and the process is based on mu-derived nuclear transfer and NLS(SV40)-derived efficient intra-nuclear transcription.

摘要

背景

质粒DNA(pDNA)的高效核内递送对于开发一种有前景的非病毒基因载体至关重要。为了实现核内递送,制备了一种新型的pDNA凝聚剂NLS-mu。它由用于凝聚pDNA的高效多肽mu和源自SV40 T抗原的核定位信号(NLS(SV40))组成。

方法

通过将编码绿色荧光蛋白(GFP)的pDNA与NLS-mu一起进行细胞质和细胞核显微注射后的转染,并与mu和聚-L-赖氨酸(PLL)比较,评估了NLS-mu的效用。细胞质显微注射后的转基因表达受核转运效率和随后的核内转录影响。为了分别评估核转运过程,我们引入了一个参数,即核转运分数(NT分数),其计算方法为细胞质显微注射后的转基因表达除以细胞核显微注射后的转基因表达。

结果

正如预期的那样,转染和细胞质显微注射后转基因表达的排序为NLS-mu > mu > PLL。然而,计算得到的NT分数出人意料地排序为mu = NLS-mu > PLL,这表明负责pDNA核内递送的是mu,而非NLS(SV40)。此外,罗丹明标记的pDNA的共聚焦图像表明,与mu和NLS-mu凝聚的pDNA以凝聚形式递送。在比较核转录时,细胞核显微注射后转基因表达的排序为PLL = NLS-mu > mu,这表明核内转录受到mu高效凝聚的抑制,而通过附着NLS(SV40)得以避免。

结论

总体而言,具有嵌合功能的NLS-mu是一种出色的DNA凝聚剂,该过程基于mu介导的核转运和NLS(SV40)介导的高效核内转录。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验