Romano Fábio Lourenço, Tavares Stenyo Wanderley, Nouer Darcy Flávio, Consani Simonides, Borges de Araújo Magnani Maria Beatriz
Piracicaba Dental School-UNICAMP, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Angle Orthod. 2005 Sep;75(5):849-53. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[849:SBSOMO]2.0.CO;2.
The aim of this study was to determine the shear bond strength of different composites and to determine the adhesive remnant index (ARI) of metallic brackets bonded to enamel prepared with Transbond Plus Self-Etching Primer (TPSEP). Forty human premolars were divided into four equal groups. In group 1 (control), the Transbond XT was conventionally used. In groups 2-4, the TPSEP was used before bonding with Transbond XT, Z-100, and Concise Orthodontic, respectively. After the bonding, the samples were stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 24 hours. The brackets were debonded using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/ min. The shear bond strength (MPa) for group 1 (control), group 2 (TPSEP + Transbond XT), group 3 (TPSEP + Z-100), and group 4 (TPSEP + Concise Orthodontic) were of 6.43, 4.61, 4.74, and 0.02, respectively. Group 1 was statistically superior to other groups (P < .05), but there was no statistically significant difference between groups 2 and 3 (P > .05), although both were statistically superior to group 4 (P < .05). According to the ARI evaluation, most of the failures involved the bracket/composite interface (groups 1 and 2) as well as the enamel/composite interface (groups 3 and 4). The Transbond XT conventionally bonded showed better adhesion results than Transbond XT, Z-100, and Concise Orthodontic after using Transbond Plus Self-Etching Primer.
本研究的目的是测定不同复合材料的剪切粘结强度,并确定用Transbond Plus自酸蚀底漆(TPSEP)处理的牙釉质上粘结金属托槽的粘结残余指数(ARI)。40颗人类前磨牙被分为四组,每组数量相等。第1组(对照组)常规使用Transbond XT。在第2 - 4组中,分别在使用Transbond XT、Z - 100和Concise Orthodontic粘结前使用TPSEP。粘结后,将样本在37℃的蒸馏水中储存24小时。使用万能材料试验机以0.5 mm/分钟的十字头速度使托槽脱粘。第1组(对照组);第2组(TPSEP + Transbond XT);第3组(TPSEP + Z - 100);第4组(TPSEP + Concise Orthodontic)的剪切粘结强度(MPa)分别为6.43、4.61、4.74和0.02。第1组在统计学上优于其他组(P < 0.05),但第2组和第3组之间无统计学显著差异(P > 0.05),尽管这两组在统计学上均优于第4组(P < 0.05)。根据ARI评估,大多数失败涉及托槽/复合材料界面(第1组和第2组)以及牙釉质/复合材料界面(第3组和第4组)。在使用Transbond Plus自酸蚀底漆后,常规粘结的Transbond XT比Transbond XT、Z - 100和Concise Orthodontic显示出更好的粘结效果。