Reamy Jack, Lovkyte Liudvika, Padaiga Zilvinas
Xavier University, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Cah Sociol Demogr Med. 2005 Apr-Sep;45(2-3):307-25.
With the collapse of the Soviet Union, countries in Eastern Europe and the Newly Independent States inherited a physician workforce that was often too large, dominated by specialists, and poorly prepared for the transition to primary health care and the addition of the family/general practice specialty. We examine attempts in selected countries to plan the future physician workforce, while attempting to reduce the size of the workforce and train physicians to lead the transition to primary health care (PHC). We look the impact these efforts have had on the current workforce and will have on the future physician workforce. With few exceptions, the first move after independence was to reduce the inputs into the physician workforce in an attempt to reduce the size of the workforce, considered large by western standards, in 1990 between 350 and 400 per 100, 000 population compared to the EU average of 299. These reductions often did not result from planning and ignored the lengthy physician training process, leading to concerns for the future supply of physicians and the conclusion that many other factors were influencing the number of physicians. At the same time, two methods were being employed to rapidly prepare physicians for PHC, retraining of existing physicians for the short-term and the establishment of training programs in the faculties of medicine to train family/general practitioners (GPs) for the long-term. GPs per 100,000 population remained at about 102 throughout the period in the original EU countries, but in the new EU countries went from 51 in 1991 to 63 in 2002. The success of the programs was varied and often depended on the overall organization of the physician workforce, the status of the new family physician within the workforce and the commitment at the national level to the transition to PHC. After over a decade of independence, there is still a struggle to have a physician workforce with the right numbers, the right specialty mix, and practicing in the right locations.
随着苏联解体,东欧国家和新独立国家继承了一支规模往往过大、以专科医生为主且对向初级卫生保健过渡以及增设家庭/全科医学专业准备不足的医生队伍。我们研究了部分国家为规划未来医生队伍所做的努力,同时试图缩减队伍规模并培养医生以引领向初级卫生保健的过渡。我们考察这些努力对当前医生队伍以及未来医生队伍所产生的影响。几乎毫无例外,独立后的首要举措是减少对医生队伍的投入,试图缩减被西方标准视为庞大的队伍规模,1990年每10万人口中有350至400名医生,而欧盟平均水平为299名。这些缩减往往并非规划所致,且忽视了漫长的医生培训过程,引发了对未来医生供应的担忧,并得出结论认为许多其他因素在影响医生数量。与此同时,当时采用了两种方法来迅速让医生为初级卫生保健做好准备,即对现有医生进行短期再培训以及在医学院校设立培训项目以长期培养家庭/全科医生。在整个时期,原欧盟国家每10万人口中的全科医生数量一直保持在约102名,但新欧盟国家从1991年的51名增至2002年的63名。这些项目的成效各不相同,且往往取决于医生队伍的整体组织情况、新家庭医生在队伍中的地位以及国家层面对于向初级卫生保健过渡的投入。经过十多年的独立发展,在组建一支数量合适、专业组合合理且在合适地点执业的医生队伍方面仍面临困难。