Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Sep;6(9):932-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.04.022.
This study sought to test the noninferiority of triple antiplatelet therapy (TAT) versus double-dose clopidogrel dual antiplatelet therapy (DDAT) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Antiplatelet regimen is an integral component of medical therapy after PCI. A 1-week duration of doubling the dose of clopidogrel was shown to improve outcome at 1 month compared with the conventional dose in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing PCI. Yet in Asia, the addition of cilostazol is used more commonly than DDAT in high-risk patients.
We randomly assigned 3,755 all-comers undergoing PCI to either TAT or DDAT, which was continued for 1 month, to test the noninferiority of TAT versus DDAT. The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of net clinical outcome at 1 month post-PCI defined as the composite of cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, stroke, and PLATO (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes) major bleeding.
TAT was noninferior to DDAT with respect to the primary outcome, which occurred in 1.2% and 1.4% of patients, respectively (-0.22% absolute difference, 0.34% 1-sided 97.5% confidence interval, p = 0.0007 for noninferiority; hazard ratio: 0.85; 95% confidence interval: 0.49 to 1.48; p = 0.558 for superiority). The individual risks of cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, stroke, and PLATO major bleeding did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. There were no significant between-group differences in the treatment effect with regard to the rate of the primary outcome.
The adjunctive use of cilostazol was noninferior to doubling the dose of clopidogrel for 1 month in all-comers undergoing PCI with exclusively drug-eluting stents. (Harmonizing Optimal Strategy for Treatment of Coronary Artery Stenosis-SAfety & EffectiveneSS of Drug-ElUting Stents & Anti-platelet REgimen [HOST-ASSURE]; NCT01267734).
本研究旨在检验经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)患者中三联抗血小板治疗(TAT)与双倍氯吡格雷双联抗血小板治疗(DDAT)的非劣效性。
抗血小板治疗方案是 PCI 后药物治疗的重要组成部分。与常规剂量相比,在接受 PCI 的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中,氯吡格雷剂量增加 1 周可改善 1 个月时的结果。然而,在亚洲,与 DDAT 相比,在高危患者中更常使用西洛他唑加用。
我们将 3755 名接受 PCI 的所有患者随机分为 TAT 或 DDAT 组,两组均继续治疗 1 个月,以检验 TAT 与 DDAT 的非劣效性。主要终点是 PCI 后 1 个月的净临床结局累积发生率,定义为心脏死亡、非致死性心肌梗死、支架血栓形成、卒中和 PLATO(血小板抑制和患者结局)大出血的复合终点。
TAT 在主要终点方面不劣于 DDAT,分别有 1.2%和 1.4%的患者发生(绝对差异为-0.22%,单侧 97.5%置信区间为 0.34%,p=0.0007 用于非劣效性;风险比:0.85;95%置信区间:0.49 至 1.48;p=0.558 用于优效性)。两组间心脏死亡、非致死性心肌梗死、支架血栓形成、卒中和 PLATO 大出血的个体风险无显著差异。两组间主要结局的治疗效果无显著差异。
在仅使用药物洗脱支架的 PCI 患者中,西洛他唑的辅助应用与氯吡格雷剂量增加 1 个月的疗效相当。(优化治疗冠状动脉狭窄的策略-药物洗脱支架和抗血小板治疗方案的安全性和有效性[HOST-ASSURE];NCT01267734)。