• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Prediction of the level of cognitive functional independence in acute care following traumatic brain injury.

作者信息

de Guise E, Leblanc J, Feyz M, Lamoureux J

机构信息

Traumatic Brain Injury Program, McGill University Health Centre-Montreal General Hospital, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

Brain Inj. 2005 Dec;19(13):1087-93. doi: 10.1080/02699050500149882.

DOI:10.1080/02699050500149882
PMID:16286322
Abstract

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE

To determine a predictive model for cognitive functional outcome of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) at discharge from acute care.

METHODS AND PROCEDURE

Three hundred and thirty-five patients were included in this analysis. Variables considered were age, education, initial score on the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), duration of post-traumatic amnesia (PTA), cerebral imaging results and the need for neurosurgical intervention.

EXPERIMENTAL INTERVENTIONS

Functional Independence Measure (FIM).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS

Results of this analysis indicated better cognitive FIM at discharge from acute care settings for patients with TBI when PTA was less than 24 hours, when level of education was higher, when no parietal lesion was identified, when no neurosurgical intervention was required, for patients with TBI who were younger and who presented with a higher GCS score upon admission.

CONCLUSIONS

This model will help to plan resource allocation for treatment and discharge planning within the first weeks following TBI.

摘要

相似文献

1
Prediction of the level of cognitive functional independence in acute care following traumatic brain injury.
Brain Inj. 2005 Dec;19(13):1087-93. doi: 10.1080/02699050500149882.
2
Functional level during sub-acute rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury: course and predictors of outcome.创伤性脑损伤后亚急性康复期间的功能水平:病程及预后预测因素
Brain Inj. 2010;24(5):740-7. doi: 10.3109/02699051003652849.
3
Presence of a dedicated trauma center physiatrist improves functional outcomes following traumatic brain injury.配备专业的创伤中心精神科医生可改善创伤性脑损伤后的功能预后。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 Jan;80(1):70-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000890.
4
Natural history of recovery from brain injury after prolonged disorders of consciousness: outcome of patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation with 1-4 year follow-up.脑损伤后长时间意识障碍的恢复自然史:1-4 年随访后住院康复患者的结局。
Prog Brain Res. 2009;177:73-88. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17707-5.
5
Changes in cognition and continence as predictors of rehabilitation outcomes in individuals with severe traumatic brain injury.认知和尿失禁的变化作为重度创伤性脑损伤患者康复结局的预测指标
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51(7):1057-68. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2014.01.0002.
6
Longitudinal outcome of patients with disordered consciousness in the NIDRR TBI Model Systems Programs.颅脑损伤康复研究中心 TBI 模型系统项目中意识障碍患者的纵向预后。
J Neurotrauma. 2012 Jan 1;29(1):59-65. doi: 10.1089/neu.2011.1829. Epub 2011 Aug 4.
7
Functional recovery following traumatic vs non-traumatic brain injury: a case-controlled study.创伤性脑损伤与非创伤性脑损伤后的功能恢复:一项病例对照研究。
Brain Inj. 2008 Dec;22(13-14):1013-20. doi: 10.1080/02699050802530581.
8
Acute global outcome in patients with mild uncomplicated and complicated traumatic brain injury.轻度单纯性和复杂性创伤性脑损伤患者的急性整体预后
Brain Inj. 2013;27(2):189-99. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2012.729288.
9
Functional outcomes in traumatic disorders of consciousness: 5-year outcomes from the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems.创伤性意识障碍的功能结果:国家残疾研究所和康复研究创伤性脑损伤模型系统的 5 年结果。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Oct;94(10):1855-60. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.10.041. Epub 2013 May 31.
10
The relationship of Injury Severity Score and Glasgow Coma Score to rehabilitative potential in patients suffering traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤患者的损伤严重程度评分和格拉斯哥昏迷评分与康复潜力的关系。
Am Surg. 2003 Jun;69(6):491-7; discussion 497-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Using machine learning to discover traumatic brain injury patient phenotypes: national concussion surveillance system Pilot.利用机器学习发现创伤性脑损伤患者表型:国家脑震荡监测系统试点项目
Brain Inj. 2024 Sep 18;38(11):880-888. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2024.2352524. Epub 2024 May 9.
2
Minimally conscious state plus versus minus: Likelihood of emergence and long-term functional independence.最小意识状态阳性与阴性:觉醒的可能性和长期功能独立性。
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2024 Mar;11(3):719-728. doi: 10.1002/acn3.51993. Epub 2024 Feb 17.
3
Neuropsychological and behavioral disorders, functional outcomes and quality of life in traumatic brain injury victims.
颅脑损伤患者的神经心理学和行为障碍、功能结局和生活质量。
Pan Afr Med J. 2021 Apr 11;38:346. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2021.38.346.16120. eCollection 2021.
4
Functional Outcomes in Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Survivors.中重度创伤性脑损伤幸存者的功能结局
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2018 Jul-Sep;11(3):197-204. doi: 10.4103/JETS.JETS_6_18.
5
Outcome in Women with Traumatic Brain Injury Admitted to a Level 1 Trauma Center.入住一级创伤中心的创伤性脑损伤女性患者的治疗结果。
Int Sch Res Notices. 2014 Aug 3;2014:263241. doi: 10.1155/2014/263241. eCollection 2014.
6
Predictors of memory and processing speed dysfunctions after traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤后记忆和处理速度功能障碍的预测因素。
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:129796. doi: 10.1155/2014/129796. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
7
Development and external validation of a new PTA assessment scale.开发并验证一种新的 PTA 评估量表。
BMC Neurol. 2012 Aug 8;12:69. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-12-69.
8
Injury severity variables as predictors of WeeFIM scores in pediatric TBI: Time to follow commands is best.儿童创伤性脑损伤中损伤严重程度变量作为儿童功能独立性测量量表(WeeFIM)评分的预测指标:对指令做出反应的时间是最佳指标。
J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2009;2(4):297-307.