• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Using machine learning to discover traumatic brain injury patient phenotypes: national concussion surveillance system Pilot.利用机器学习发现创伤性脑损伤患者表型:国家脑震荡监测系统试点项目
Brain Inj. 2024 Sep 18;38(11):880-888. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2024.2352524. Epub 2024 May 9.
2
A Four-Country Study of Strangulation-Related Alterations in Consciousness in Women Who Have Experienced Intimate Partner Violence: Co-Occurrence with Traumatic Brain Injuries and Measures of Psychological Distress.一项涉及四个国家的研究表明,经历过亲密伴侣暴力的女性中,与勒颈相关的意识改变与创伤性脑损伤和心理困扰的衡量标准同时存在。
J Neurotrauma. 2024 Jul;41(13-14):e1666-e1677. doi: 10.1089/neu.2023.0440. Epub 2024 May 9.
3
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
4
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
5
Does the Presence of Missing Data Affect the Performance of the SORG Machine-learning Algorithm for Patients With Spinal Metastasis? Development of an Internet Application Algorithm.缺失数据的存在是否会影响 SORG 机器学习算法在脊柱转移瘤患者中的性能?开发一种互联网应用算法。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jan 1;482(1):143-157. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002706. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
6
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
7
Technological aids for the rehabilitation of memory and executive functioning in children and adolescents with acquired brain injury.脑损伤儿童和青少年记忆与执行功能康复的技术辅助手段。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 1;7(7):CD011020. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011020.pub2.
8
Can a Liquid Biopsy Detect Circulating Tumor DNA With Low-passage Whole-genome Sequencing in Patients With a Sarcoma? A Pilot Evaluation.液体活检能否通过低深度全基因组测序检测肉瘤患者的循环肿瘤DNA?一项初步评估。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):39-48. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003161. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
9
Improving Cognitive Empathy Through Traumatic Brain Injury Experiential Learning: A Novel Mixed Methods Approach for Speech-Language Pathology Graduate Education.通过创伤性脑损伤体验式学习提高认知同理心:一种用于言语语言病理学研究生教育的新型混合方法。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2025 Jan 13:1-33. doi: 10.1044/2024_AJSLP-24-00126.
10
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 50 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2022.暴力死亡监测——2022年全国暴力死亡报告系统,50个州、哥伦比亚特区和波多黎各
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2025 Jun 12;74(5):1-42. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7405a1.

本文引用的文献

1
Identification of clinically relevant patient endotypes in traumatic brain injury using latent class analysis.运用潜在类别分析鉴定创伤性脑损伤中有临床意义的患者内表型。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 14;14(1):1294. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51474-0.
2
Rationale for the Development of a Traumatic Brain Injury Case Definition for the Pilot National Concussion Surveillance System.制定 Pilot National Concussion Surveillance System(国家脑震荡监测系统试点)创伤性脑损伤病例定义的基本原理。
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2024;39(2):115-120. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000900. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
3
Refinement of a Preliminary Case Definition for Use in Traumatic Brain Injury Surveillance.创伤性脑损伤监测用初步病例定义的细化。
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2024;39(2):121-139. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000901. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
4
Unsupervised machine learning identifies symptoms of indigestion as a predictor of acute decompensation and adverse cardiac events in patients with heart failure presenting to the emergency department.无监督机器学习可识别消化不良症状,作为预测心力衰竭患者因急性失代偿和不良心脏事件就诊于急诊科的指标。
Heart Lung. 2023 Sep-Oct;61:107-113. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2023.05.012. Epub 2023 May 27.
5
Functional Recovery, Symptoms, and Quality of Life 1 to 5 Years After Traumatic Brain Injury.创伤性脑损伤 1 至 5 年后的功能恢复、症状和生活质量。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e233660. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.3660.
6
An unsupervised learning approach to diagnosing Alzheimer's disease using brain magnetic resonance imaging scans.一种使用脑磁共振成像扫描诊断阿尔茨海默病的无监督学习方法。
Int J Med Inform. 2023 May;173:105027. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105027. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
7
Disparities in traumatic brain injury-related deaths-United States, 2020.创伤性脑损伤相关死亡的差异-美国,2020 年。
J Safety Res. 2022 Dec;83:419-426. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2022.10.001. Epub 2022 Oct 18.
8
Assessment of the individual and compounding effects of marginalization factors on injury severity, discharge location, recovery, and employment outcomes at 1 year after traumatic brain injury.评估脑外伤后1年时边缘化因素对损伤严重程度、出院地点、康复及就业结局的个体及综合影响。
Front Neurol. 2022 Aug 26;13:942001. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.942001. eCollection 2022.
9
Clustering identifies endotypes of traumatic brain injury in an intensive care cohort: a CENTER-TBI study.聚类分析确定了重症监护队列中创伤性脑损伤的表型:CENTER-TBI 研究。
Crit Care. 2022 Jul 27;26(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04079-w.
10
Concussion Evaluation Patterns Among US Adults.美国成年人脑震荡评估模式。
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2022;37(5):303-310. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000756. Epub 2022 Feb 1.

利用机器学习发现创伤性脑损伤患者表型:国家脑震荡监测系统试点项目

Using machine learning to discover traumatic brain injury patient phenotypes: national concussion surveillance system Pilot.

作者信息

Waltzman Dana, Daugherty Jill, Peterson Alexis, Lumba-Brown Angela

机构信息

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (NCIPC), Division of Injury Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.

出版信息

Brain Inj. 2024 Sep 18;38(11):880-888. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2024.2352524. Epub 2024 May 9.

DOI:10.1080/02699052.2024.2352524
PMID:38722037
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11323138/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective is to determine whether unsupervised machine learning identifies traumatic brain injury (TBI) phenotypes with unique clinical profiles.

METHODS

Pilot self-reported survey data of over 10,000 adults were collected from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)'s National Concussion Surveillance System (NCSS). Respondents who self-reported a head injury in the past 12 months ( = 1,364) were retained and queried for injury, outcome, and clinical characteristics. An unsupervised machine learning algorithm, partitioning around medoids (PAM), that employed Gower's dissimilarity matrix, was used to conduct a cluster analysis.

RESULTS

PAM grouped respondents into five TBI clusters (phenotypes A-E). Phenotype C represented more clinically severe TBIs with a higher prevalence of symptoms and association with worse outcomes. When compared to individuals in Phenotype A, a group with few TBI-related symptoms, individuals in Phenotype C were more likely to undergo medical evaluation (odds ratio [OR] = 9.8, 95% confidence interval[CI] = 5.8-16.6), have symptoms that were not currently resolved or resolved in 8+ days (OR = 10.6, 95%CI = 6.2-18.1), and more likely to report at least moderate impact on social (OR = 54.7, 95%CI = 22.4-133.4) and work (OR = 25.4, 95%CI = 11.2-57.2) functioning.

CONCLUSION

Machine learning can be used to classify patients into unique TBI phenotypes. Further research might examine the utility of such classifications in supporting clinical diagnosis and patient recovery for this complex health condition.

摘要

目的

确定无监督机器学习能否识别出具有独特临床特征的创伤性脑损伤(TBI)表型。

方法

从疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)的国家脑震荡监测系统(NCSS)收集了10000多名成年人的初步自我报告调查数据。保留了在过去12个月内自我报告有头部损伤的受访者(n = 1364),并询问其损伤情况、结果和临床特征。使用一种无监督机器学习算法——围绕中心点划分法(PAM),该算法采用了高尔距离矩阵,进行聚类分析。

结果

PAM将受访者分为五个TBI聚类(表型A - E)。表型C代表临床上更严重的TBI,症状患病率更高,且与更差的结果相关。与表型A(一组几乎没有TBI相关症状的个体)中的个体相比,表型C中的个体更有可能接受医学评估(优势比[OR] = 9.8,95%置信区间[CI] = 5.8 - 16.6),有目前未解决或在8天以上才解决的症状(OR = 10.6,95%CI = 6.2 - 18.1),并且更有可能报告对社交(OR = 54.7,95%CI = 22.4 - 133.4)和工作(OR = 25.4,95%CI = 11.2 - 57.2)功能至少有中度影响。

结论

机器学习可用于将患者分类为独特的TBI表型。进一步的研究可能会检验这种分类在支持这种复杂健康状况的临床诊断和患者康复方面的效用。