• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

症状自评量表90项修订版与轻度创伤性脑损伤

The symptom checklist-90-revised and mild traumatic brain injury.

作者信息

Westcott M C, Alfano D P

机构信息

Department of Applied Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Brain Inj. 2005 Dec 20;19(14):1261-7. doi: 10.1080/02699050500150104.

DOI:10.1080/02699050500150104
PMID:16286342
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Assessment of emotional functioning is a critical aspect of the clinical neuropsychological evaluation of individuals following mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI). The objective of this study was to examine the utility of the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised as a brief tool for assessing psychological and symptomatic distress following MTBI.

METHOD

A contrasted groups approach, involving three clinical groups (MTBI, Whiplash Associated Disorder, Type I Diabetes) and a non-clinical control group, was used in this study.

RESULTS

The group with MTBI scored significantly higher on the majority of primary symptom dimensions and global distress indices of the SCL-90-R compared to both the diabetes and non-clinical control groups. Analysis of individual cases further revealed that 68.2% of the participants in the group with MTBI were classified as positive cases, a rate significantly higher than that of the diabetes and non-clinical control groups. The group with MTBI did not differ significantly from the group of individuals with whiplash associated disorder with respect to elevation of primary symptom dimensions or global distress indices, or the number of cases classified as positive.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that the SCL-90-R has considerable utility as a general measure of psychological and symptomatic distress following MTBI.

摘要

目的

对轻度创伤性脑损伤(MTBI)患者进行临床神经心理学评估时,情绪功能评估是一个关键方面。本研究的目的是检验症状自评量表-90修订版(SCL-90-R)作为评估MTBI后心理和症状困扰的简短工具的效用。

方法

本研究采用对比组方法,涉及三个临床组(MTBI、挥鞭样相关障碍、I型糖尿病)和一个非临床对照组。

结果

与糖尿病组和非临床对照组相比,MTBI组在SCL-90-R的大多数主要症状维度和总体困扰指数上得分显著更高。对个体病例的分析进一步显示,MTBI组中68.2%的参与者被归类为阳性病例,这一比例显著高于糖尿病组和非临床对照组。MTBI组在主要症状维度或总体困扰指数的升高以及归类为阳性的病例数量方面与挥鞭样相关障碍个体组没有显著差异。

结论

本研究结果表明,SCL-90-R作为MTBI后心理和症状困扰的一般测量方法具有相当大的效用。

相似文献

1
The symptom checklist-90-revised and mild traumatic brain injury.症状自评量表90项修订版与轻度创伤性脑损伤
Brain Inj. 2005 Dec 20;19(14):1261-7. doi: 10.1080/02699050500150104.
2
Affective disorders after traumatic brain injury: cautions in the use of the Symptom Checklist-90-R.创伤性脑损伤后的情感障碍:使用症状自评量表90修订版时的注意事项
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2000 Dec;15(6):1246-55. doi: 10.1097/00001199-200012000-00005.
3
Anxiety sensitivity and alexithymia as mediators of postconcussion syndrome following mild traumatic brain injury.焦虑敏感和述情障碍作为轻度创伤性脑损伤后脑震荡后综合征的中介。
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2014 Jan-Feb;29(1):E9-E17. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e31827eabba.
4
Influence of poor effort on neuropsychological test performance in U.S. military personnel following mild traumatic brain injury.美国军人轻微脑外伤后,努力程度不佳对神经心理学测试表现的影响。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2012;34(5):453-66. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2011.648175. Epub 2012 Jan 24.
5
Predictors of postconcussive symptoms 3 months after mild traumatic brain injury.轻创伤性脑损伤后 3 个月的脑震荡后症状预测因素。
Neuropsychology. 2012 May;26(3):304-13. doi: 10.1037/a0027888. Epub 2012 Apr 2.
6
An examination of the factor structure of the Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire modified for adults with mild traumatic brain injury.对为患有轻度创伤性脑损伤的成年人修改后的《修订疾病认知问卷》的因素结构进行的一项检查。
Brain Inj. 2010;24(13-14):1595-605. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2010.523048. Epub 2010 Oct 25.
7
Cognitive complaints after mild traumatic brain injury: things are not always what they seem.轻度创伤性脑损伤后的认知主诉:事情并非总是表面看上去的那样。
J Psychosom Res. 2007 Dec;63(6):637-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.06.023.
8
Emotional and cognitive sequelae to mild traumatic brain injury.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1999 Apr;21(2):200-15. doi: 10.1076/jcen.21.2.200.930.
9
Diffusion tensor imaging of acute mild traumatic brain injury in adolescents.青少年急性轻度创伤性脑损伤的扩散张量成像
Neurology. 2008 Mar 18;70(12):948-55. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000305961.68029.54.
10
Evaluating the utility of ICD-10 diagnostic criteria for postconcussion syndrome following mild traumatic brain injury.评估国际疾病分类第十版(ICD - 10)诊断标准对轻度创伤性脑损伤后创伤后综合征的适用性。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2006 Jan;12(1):111-8. doi: 10.1017/S1355617706060036.

引用本文的文献

1
Good Health-Related Quality of Life in Older Patients One Year after mTBI despite Incomplete Recovery: An Indication of the Disability Paradox?尽管未完全康复,但中重度创伤性脑损伤老年患者一年后仍具有良好的健康相关生活质量:残疾悖论的一种体现?
J Clin Med. 2024 May 1;13(9):2655. doi: 10.3390/jcm13092655.