Suppr超能文献

美国军人轻微脑外伤后,努力程度不佳对神经心理学测试表现的影响。

Influence of poor effort on neuropsychological test performance in U.S. military personnel following mild traumatic brain injury.

机构信息

Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center, North Bethesda, MD 20852, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2012;34(5):453-66. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2011.648175. Epub 2012 Jan 24.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of poor effort on neuropsychological test performance in military personnel following mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI). Participants were 143 U.S. service members who sustained a TBI, divided into three groups based on injury severity and performance on the Word Memory Test and four embedded markers of poor effort: MTBI-pass (n = 87), MTBI-fail (n = 21), and STBI-pass (n = 35; where STBI denotes severe TBI). Patients were evaluated at the Walter Reed Army Medical Center on average 3.9 months (SD = 3.4) post injury. The majority of the sample was Caucasian (84.6%), was male (93.0%), and had 12+ years of education (96.5%). Measures included the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) and 13 common neurocognitive measures. Patients in the MTBI-fail group performed worse on the majority of neurocognitive measures, followed by the Severe TBI-Pass group and the MTBI-pass group. Using a criterion of three or more low scores <10th percentile, the MTBI-fail group had the greatest rate of impairment (76.2%), followed by the Severe TBI-Pass group (34.3%) and MTBI-pass group (16.1%). On the PAI, the MTBI-fail group had higher scores on the majority of clinical scales (p < .05). There were a greater number of elevated scales (e.g., 5 or more elevated mild or higher) in the MTBI-fail group (71.4%) than in the MTBI-pass group (32.2%) and Severe TBI-Pass group (17.1%). Effort testing is an important component of postacute neuropsychological evaluations following combat-related MTBI. Those who fail effort testing are likely to be misdiagnosed as having severe cognitive impairment, and their symptom reporting is likely to be inaccurate.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨在经历轻度创伤性脑损伤(MTBI)后,军人的神经心理学测试表现中努力程度不佳的影响。参与者为 143 名美国服役人员,根据损伤严重程度和单词记忆测试以及四项努力程度不佳的嵌入式标志物的表现,将他们分为三组:MTBI 合格组(n=87)、MTBI 不合格组(n=21)和 STBI 合格组(n=35;其中 STBI 表示严重 TBI)。患者在受伤后平均 3.9 个月(SD=3.4)在 Walter Reed 陆军医疗中心接受评估。样本中的大多数人是白人(84.6%),男性(93.0%),教育程度在 12 年以上(96.5%)。评估措施包括人格评估量表(PAI)和 13 项常见神经认知测试。MTBI 不合格组在大多数神经认知测试中的表现较差,其次是严重 TBI 合格组和 MTBI 合格组。使用三个或更多低于第 10 个百分位数的低分标准,MTBI 不合格组的损伤率最高(76.2%),其次是严重 TBI 合格组(34.3%)和 MTBI 合格组(16.1%)。在 PAI 上,MTBI 不合格组在大多数临床量表上的得分较高(p<.05)。MTBI 不合格组(71.4%)比 MTBI 合格组(32.2%)和严重 TBI 合格组(17.1%)有更多的量表升高(例如,5 个或更多升高的轻度或更高)。努力测试是战斗相关 MTBI 后急性期神经心理评估的重要组成部分。那些努力测试不合格的人很可能被误诊为严重认知障碍,他们的症状报告可能不准确。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验