Carabine U A, Allen R W, Moore J
Department of Anaesthetics, Queen's University, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1992 Jul;9(4):325-9.
In a randomized, double-blind placebo controlled study, intravenous clonidine, fentanyl and saline were compared for both their effect on the cardiovascular response to intubation, and early post-operative pain. The patients treated with fentanyl and clonidine were more sedated and the requirements for induction agents were lower compared to the control group. On intubation, both the active treatments resulted in a smaller increase in both heart rate and mean arterial pressure compared to the control group. There was no significant difference in recovery times in the three groups. Although the time to first request for analgesia was longer in the clonidine group compared to both the fentanyl and saline groups, the difference in morphine requirements between the groups was not significant. The differences between the two active treatments were not significant, and clonidine offered no additional benefits over fentanyl for this purpose.
在一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究中,对静脉注射可乐定、芬太尼和生理盐水在插管时对心血管反应的影响以及术后早期疼痛方面进行了比较。与对照组相比,接受芬太尼和可乐定治疗的患者镇静作用更强,诱导药物的需求量更低。插管时,与对照组相比,两种活性治疗方法导致心率和平均动脉压的升高幅度更小。三组的恢复时间没有显著差异。尽管可乐定组首次要求镇痛的时间比芬太尼组和生理盐水组更长,但三组之间吗啡需求量的差异并不显著。两种活性治疗方法之间的差异不显著,在此方面可乐定并未比芬太尼提供额外的益处。