• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童中单次静脉注射瑞芬太尼与单次静脉注射芬太尼用于减轻心血管插管反应的比较:一项随机、双盲研究。

Comparison of bolus remifentanil versus bolus fentanyl for blunting cardiovascular intubation responses in children: a randomized, double-blind study.

作者信息

Yang Quan-yong, Xue Fu-shan, Liao Xu, Liu He-ping, Luo Mao-ping, Xu Ya-chao, Liu Yi, Zhang Yan-ming

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Chin Med J (Engl). 2009 Jan 5;122(1):44-50.

PMID:19187616
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The authors found no study to compare the efficacy of bolus dose fentanyl and remifentanil blunting the cardiovascular intubation response in children, so they designed this randomized, double-blind clinical study to assess the effects of remifentanil 2 microg/kg and fentanyl 2 microg/kg by bolus injection on the cardiovascular intubation response in healthy children.

METHODS

One hundred and two children, the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 1-2 and scheduled for elective plastic surgery under general anesthesia, were randomly divided into one of two groups to receive the following treatments in a double blind manner: remifentanil 2 microg/kg (Group R) and fentanyl 2 microg/kg (Group F) when anesthesia was induced with propofol and vecuronium. The orotracheal intubation was performed using a direct laryngoscope. Blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded before anesthesia induction (baseline values), immediately before intubation, at intubation and every minute for 5 minutes after intubation. The percent changes of systolic blood pressure (SBP) and HR relative to baseline values and the rate pressure product (RPP) at every observing point were calculated. The incidences of SBP and HR percent changes >30% of baseline values and RPP >22,000 during the observation were recorded.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between groups in the demographic data, baseline values of BP and HR and the intubation time. As compared to baseline values, BP, HR and RPP at intubation and their maximum values during observation increased significantly in Group F, but they all decreased significantly in Group R. BP, HR and RPP at all observed points, and their maximum values during the observation, were significantly different between groups. There were also significant differences between groups in the percent change of SBP and HR relative to baseline values at all observed points and their maximum percent changes during the observation. The incidences of SBP and HR percent increased >30% of the baseline values and RPP >22,000 during the observation, were significantly higher in Group F than in Group R, but the incidences of SBP and HR percent decreased >30% of baseline values were significantly lower in Group F compared with Group R.

CONCLUSIONS

When used as part of routine anesthesia induction with propofol and vecuronium in children, fentanyl 2 microg/kg by bolus injection fails to effectively depress the cardiovascular intubation response. Remifentanil 2 microg/kg by bolus injection can completely abolish the cardiovascular intubation response, but also cause more adverse complications of temporary significant cardiovascular depression.

摘要

背景

作者发现尚无研究比较单次剂量芬太尼和瑞芬太尼对儿童心血管插管反应的抑制效果,因此设计了这项随机、双盲临床研究,以评估单次注射2微克/千克瑞芬太尼和2微克/千克芬太尼对健康儿童心血管插管反应的影响。

方法

102名美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况为1 - 2级、计划在全身麻醉下进行择期整形手术的儿童,被随机分为两组之一,以双盲方式接受以下治疗:在用丙泊酚和维库溴铵诱导麻醉时,瑞芬太尼2微克/千克(R组)和芬太尼2微克/千克(F组)。使用直接喉镜进行经口气管插管。记录麻醉诱导前(基线值)、插管前即刻、插管时以及插管后5分钟内每分钟的血压(BP)和心率(HR)。计算每个观察点收缩压(SBP)和HR相对于基线值的变化百分比以及率压积(RPP)。记录观察期间SBP和HR变化百分比>基线值30%以及RPP>22,000的发生率。

结果

两组在人口统计学数据、BP和HR基线值以及插管时间方面无显著差异。与基线值相比,F组插管时的BP、HR和RPP及其观察期间的最大值显著升高,但R组均显著降低。各观察点的BP、HR和RPP及其观察期间的最大值在两组间有显著差异。所有观察点SBP和HR相对于基线值的变化百分比及其观察期间的最大变化百分比在两组间也有显著差异。观察期间SBP和HR变化百分比>基线值30%以及RPP>22,000的发生率,F组显著高于R组,但SBP和HR变化百分比降低>基线值30%的发生率F组显著低于R组。

结论

当作为儿童丙泊酚和维库溴铵常规麻醉诱导的一部分使用时,单次注射2微克/千克芬太尼不能有效抑制心血管插管反应。单次注射2微克/千克瑞芬太尼可完全消除心血管插管反应,但也会导致更多短暂性显著心血管抑制的不良并发症。

相似文献

1
Comparison of bolus remifentanil versus bolus fentanyl for blunting cardiovascular intubation responses in children: a randomized, double-blind study.儿童中单次静脉注射瑞芬太尼与单次静脉注射芬太尼用于减轻心血管插管反应的比较:一项随机、双盲研究。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2009 Jan 5;122(1):44-50.
2
Bolus dose remifentanil and sufentanil blunting cardiovascular intubation responses in children: a randomized, double-blind comparison.单次静脉注射瑞芬太尼和舒芬太尼对儿童心血管插管反应的抑制作用:一项随机双盲比较研究。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009 Jan;26(1):73-80. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32831a6b2f.
3
Assessment of small-dose fentanyl and sufentanil blunting the cardiovascular responses to laryngoscopy and intubation in children.小剂量芬太尼和舒芬太尼对儿童喉镜检查和气管插管心血管反应的抑制作用评估。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2007 Jun;17(6):568-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2006.02162.x.
4
Peri-intubation hemodynamic changes during low dose fentanyl, remifentanil and sufentanil combined with etomidate for anesthetic induction.依托咪酯麻醉诱导时小剂量芬太尼、瑞芬太尼和舒芬太尼联合应用对围插管期血流动力学的影响。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2009 Oct 5;122(19):2330-4.
5
Different small-dose remifentanil blunting the cardiovascular response to laryngoscopy and intubation in children: a randomized double-blind comparison.不同小剂量瑞芬太尼对儿童喉镜检查和气管插管心血管反应的抑制作用:一项随机双盲对照研究
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2008 Feb;25(2):106-12. doi: 10.1017/S026502150700261X. Epub 2007 Sep 13.
6
Clinical comparison of either small doses of fentanyl or remifentanil for blunting cardiovascular changes induced by tracheal intubation.小剂量芬太尼或瑞芬太尼减轻气管插管引起的心血管变化的临床比较。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2000 Oct;66(10):691-6.
7
[Comparison of hemodynamic responses to nasotracheal intubations with Glide Scope video-laryngoscope, Macintosh direct laryngoscope, and fiberoptic bronchoscope].[使用Glide Scope视频喉镜、麦金托什直接喉镜和纤维支气管镜进行鼻气管插管时血流动力学反应的比较]
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2007 Feb;29(1):117-23.
8
[Comparison of cardiovascular responses between orotracheal and nasotracheal intubation with the aid of GlideScope video laryngoscope].[借助GlideScope视频喉镜进行经口气管插管与经鼻气管插管时心血管反应的比较]
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2008 Jul;20(7):405-8.
9
[Hemodynamic responses to orotracheal intubation with fiberoptic bronchoscope and direct laryngoscope in children].[儿童使用纤维支气管镜和直接喉镜经口气管插管的血流动力学反应]
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2005 Dec;27(6):712-7.
10
Comparison of hemodynamic responses to orotracheal intubation with the GlideScope videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh direct laryngoscope.使用GlideScope视频喉镜和Macintosh直接喉镜进行经口气管插管时血流动力学反应的比较。
J Clin Anesth. 2007 Jun;19(4):245-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2006.11.004.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of sufentanil combined with remifentanil on hemodynamics during induction and postoperative recovery quality in preschool children undergoing tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy.舒芬太尼联合瑞芬太尼对扁桃体切除术和腺样体切除术学龄前儿童诱导期血流动力学及术后恢复质量的影响
BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Aug 29;25(1):431. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03315-4.
2
Effects of Fentanyl Versus Remifentanil Pretreatment on the QTc Interval in Patients Undergoing Rapid Sequence Intubation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.芬太尼与瑞芬太尼预处理对快速顺序诱导插管患者QTc间期的影响:一项随机临床试验
Anesth Pain Med. 2022 Nov 25;12(5):e131184. doi: 10.5812/aapm-131184. eCollection 2022 Oct.
3
Comparison of fentanyl and clonidine for attenuation of the haemodynamic response to laryngocopy and endotracheal intubation.
芬太尼与可乐定对喉镜检查和气管插管血流动力学反应的衰减作用比较。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2013 Jan;7(1):106-11. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2012/4988.2682. Epub 2012 Nov 10.
4
Dose fentanyl injection for blunting the hemodynamic response to intubation increase the risk of reflex bradycardia during major abdominal surgery?芬太尼注射用于减轻气管插管时的血流动力学反应是否会增加大型腹部手术期间反射性心动过缓的风险?
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2012 Nov;63(5):402-8. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2012.63.5.402. Epub 2012 Nov 16.
5
Sedation and analgesia in intensive care: a comparison of fentanyl and remifentanil.重症监护中的镇静与镇痛:芬太尼与瑞芬太尼的比较
Pain Res Treat. 2011;2011:650320. doi: 10.1155/2011/650320. Epub 2011 Jul 2.