Perencevich Eli N, Harris Anthony D, Kaye Keith S, Bradham Douglas D, Fisman David N, Liedtke Laura A, Strausbaugh Larry J
Veterans Affairs Maryland Healthcare System, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Clin Infect Dis. 2005 Dec 15;41(12):1734-41. doi: 10.1086/498116. Epub 2005 Nov 10.
Decreasing the duration of antimicrobial therapy is an attractive strategy for delaying the emergence of antimicrobial resistance. Limited data regarding optimal treatment durations for most clinical infections hinder the adoption of this approach and impair optimal physician-patient communication under the shared decision-making model. We aimed to identify acceptable failure rates among infectious disease consultants (IDCs) for treatment of central venous catheter-associated bacteremia.
A case scenario involving a representative patient who developed central venous catheter-associated bacteremia caused by coagulase-negative staphylococci and who received standard-of-care therapy was distributed to all nonpediatric IDC members of the Infectious Diseases Society of America's Emerging Infections Network in August 2003. Each member was suggested 1 of 10 treatment failure rates and asked whether he or she would accept or reject the given value. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the relationship between specific failure rates offered to respondents and their willingness to accept them using a methodology derived from contingent valuation.
Among the 374 respondents (response rate, 54%), the median acceptable failure rate was 6.8%. Thus, one-half of the IDCs would have found a failure rate of 6.8% to be acceptable. Seventy-five percent of IDCs would have found a failure rate of 1.6% to be acceptable, and 25% of IDCs would have found a failure rate as high as 11.9% to be acceptable.
The quantified acceptable failure rates, when used to interpret clinical trial or cohort study results, will help select optimal antimicrobial therapy durations for this specific condition. These findings are a critical step in the development of effective shared decision-making models.
缩短抗菌治疗疗程是延缓抗菌药物耐药性出现的一项有吸引力的策略。关于大多数临床感染的最佳治疗疗程的数据有限,这阻碍了该方法的采用,并损害了共享决策模型下医患之间的最佳沟通。我们旨在确定传染病顾问(IDCs)对于治疗中心静脉导管相关菌血症可接受的失败率。
2003年8月,一个涉及由凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌引起中心静脉导管相关菌血症并接受标准治疗的代表性患者的病例情景被分发给美国传染病学会新发感染网络的所有非儿科IDCs成员。向每位成员提出10种治疗失败率中的1种,并询问其是否接受或拒绝给定的值。使用源自条件价值评估的方法,采用逻辑回归来评估提供给受访者的特定失败率与其接受意愿之间的关系。
在374名受访者中(回复率为54%),可接受失败率的中位数为6.8%。因此,一半的IDCs会认为失败率为6.8%是可接受的。75%的IDCs会认为失败率为1.6%是可接受的,25%的IDCs会认为高达11.9%的失败率是可接受的。
当用于解释临床试验或队列研究结果时,量化的可接受失败率将有助于为这种特定情况选择最佳抗菌治疗疗程。这些发现是有效共享决策模型发展中的关键一步。