Sone Teruki, Imai Yoshiyuki, Joo Yong-In, Onodera Sho, Tomomitsu Tatsushi, Fukunaga Masao
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Kawasaki Medical School, 577 Matsushima, Kurashiki, Okayama 701-0192, Japan.
Bone. 2006 May;38(5):708-13. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2005.10.002. Epub 2005 Nov 10.
The importance of physical activity in the development and maintenance of bone mineral density (BMD) is widely accepted. However, the effects on cortical BMD have not been clarified in detail. The present study examined bilateral asymmetries in cortical BMD of the tibia using peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Subjects comprised 37 young male athletes and 57 controls (age range, 18-28 years). BMD and geometrical indices were determined in bilateral tibiae. Cortical and trabecular BMD were calculated at the diaphysis and distal metaphysis, respectively. Cortical width, periosteal cross-sectional area, and cross-sectional moment of inertia were calculated using tomographic data of the tibial diaphysis. In athletes, the non-dominant leg showed greater cortical BMD than the dominant leg (mean difference, 5.42%; P < 0.0001). Cortical width and moment of inertia were also greater in the non-dominant leg. Periosteal area displayed no significant difference between legs. The control group exhibited similar results except for cortical BMD. No differences in trabecular BMD were noted between legs in either athletes or controls. These results implies the existence of mechanisms for the mechanical adaptation of cortical BMD. Dominant leg is used for mobility or manipulation whereas the non-dominant leg contributes to support the actions of the dominant leg. Loading differences in bilateral legs in young athletes might affect the remodeling rate leading to the side-to-side differences in cortical BMD.
体育活动在骨矿物质密度(BMD)的发展和维持中的重要性已被广泛认可。然而,其对皮质骨BMD的影响尚未得到详细阐明。本研究使用外周定量计算机断层扫描检查了胫骨皮质骨BMD的双侧不对称性。受试者包括37名年轻男性运动员和57名对照组(年龄范围为18 - 28岁)。测定双侧胫骨的BMD和几何指数。分别计算骨干和远端干骺端的皮质骨和小梁骨BMD。使用胫骨骨干的断层扫描数据计算皮质骨宽度、骨膜横截面积和截面惯性矩。在运动员中,非优势腿的皮质骨BMD高于优势腿(平均差异为5.42%;P < 0.0001)。非优势腿的皮质骨宽度和惯性矩也更大。骨膜面积在两腿之间无显著差异。对照组除皮质骨BMD外显示出类似结果。在运动员或对照组中,两腿之间的小梁骨BMD均未发现差异。这些结果意味着存在皮质骨BMD机械适应的机制。优势腿用于移动或操作,而非优势腿则有助于支撑优势腿的动作。年轻运动员双侧腿部的负荷差异可能会影响重塑率,导致皮质骨BMD的左右差异。