Dickson Chata A, Wang Sharon S, Lombard Kristin M, Dube William V
Psychological Sciences Division, UMMS Shriver Center, 200 Trapelo Road, Waltham, MA 02452, USA.
Res Dev Disabil. 2006 Nov-Dec;27(6):618-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2005.07.004. Epub 2005 Nov 14.
Overselective stimulus control was assessed in 29 students at residential schools for individuals with developmental disabilities. Overselectivity testing included three different delayed identity matching-to-sample tasks. Sample stimuli for the Form/Color Test were nine possible combinations of three colors and three forms. On each trial, the S+ stimulus was identical to the sample, one S- was the same color as the sample but a different form, and the other S- was the same form but a different color. Sample stimuli for the Two-Sample Test were two alphanumeric characters. The S+ stimulus was identical to one of the sample stimuli, and two S- stimuli were characters different from both samples. Sample stimuli for the Faces Test were six digital images of adult faces. On each trial, the S+ stimulus was identical to the sample, one S- stimulus was a non-matching face to which one sample feature had been added (e.g., an identical hat or scarf), and the other S- stimulus was an unaltered non-matching face. All participants were also tested with the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test III (PPVT) and the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS). Results indicated overselective stimulus control on at least one test for 18 of the 29 participants. Overselectivity (a) was distributed across a range of PPVT mental age equivalent scores from <1.75 to 8.83; (b) was more likely in individuals with higher ADOS scores; (c) was most likely on the Two-Sample Test; and (d) was found in five individuals on more than one of the tests. Thus, overselective stimulus control may occur across a range of characteristics typical for students who attend residential special-education programs.
对29名就读于为发育障碍者设立的寄宿学校的学生进行了过度选择性刺激控制评估。过度选择性测试包括三项不同的延迟身份匹配样本任务。形状/颜色测试的样本刺激是三种颜色和三种形状的九种可能组合。在每次试验中,正性刺激(S+)与样本相同,一个负性刺激(S-)与样本颜色相同但形状不同,另一个负性刺激与样本形状相同但颜色不同。双样本测试的样本刺激是两个字母数字字符。正性刺激与其中一个样本刺激相同,两个负性刺激是与两个样本都不同的字符。面部测试的样本刺激是六张成人面部的数字图像。在每次试验中,正性刺激与样本相同,一个负性刺激是添加了一个样本特征(如相同的帽子或围巾)的不匹配面部,另一个负性刺激是未改变的不匹配面部。所有参与者还接受了皮博迪图片词汇测试第三版(PPVT)和自闭症诊断观察量表(ADOS)测试。结果表明,29名参与者中有18名在至少一项测试中存在过度选择性刺激控制。过度选择性(a)分布在PPVT心理年龄等效分数范围从<1.75到8.83之间;(b)在ADOS分数较高的个体中更常见;(c)在双样本测试中最常见;(d)在五项个体中在不止一项测试中被发现。因此,过度选择性刺激控制可能发生在就读寄宿特殊教育项目的学生的一系列典型特征中。