Matsumura Shuichi, Hayden Thomas J
Mammal Research Group, UCD School of Biological and Environmental Science, National University of Ireland, Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Republic of Ireland.
J Theor Biol. 2006 Jun 7;240(3):425-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.10.002. Epub 2005 Nov 15.
During contests, losing animals often show signals communicating submission. From an evolutionary viewpoint, however, it is not so obvious why the losing individual gives such a signal instead of running away and why the winning individual accepts the signal instead of inflicting more severe damage. We investigated factors influencing the evolution of signals of submission using a numerical ESS model. The present analysis reveals that there is much space for the evolution of signals of submission, even when the winner of an escalated contest gets some extra benefit. In most cases, signals of submission are given by animals which are slightly or moderately weaker than the opponent. Signals of submission are expected to occur frequently (1) when the value of contested resource does not differ greatly from the cost of injury, (2) when the extra benefit of winning an escalated contest is small, (3) when the opportunity for safe retreat by the losing animal is small, and (4) when the estimation of the difference in the resource holding potential (RHP) between the combatants is accurate but not perfect.
在争斗中,失败的动物常常会发出表示屈服的信号。然而,从进化的角度来看,失败的个体为何发出这样的信号而不是逃跑,以及胜利的个体为何接受该信号而不是造成更严重的伤害,这并不那么显而易见。我们使用数值ESS模型研究了影响屈服信号进化的因素。目前的分析表明,即使在激烈争斗的胜者获得一些额外好处的情况下,屈服信号的进化仍有很大空间。在大多数情况下,屈服信号由比对手略弱或中等程度较弱的动物发出。预计在以下情况下屈服信号会频繁出现:(1) 争夺资源的价值与受伤成本相差不大时;(2) 在激烈争斗中获胜的额外好处很小时;(3) 失败的动物安全撤退的机会很小时;(4) 战斗者之间资源持有潜力(RHP)差异的估计准确但不完美时。