Suppr超能文献

儿童单浓度乙酰甲胆碱吸入激发试验(SCIPT)的验证

Validation of a single concentration methacholine inhalation provocation test (SCIPT) in children.

作者信息

Hagmolen of ten Have Wanda, van den Berg N J, van der Palen J, Bindels P J E, van Aalderen W M C

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Flevohospital, Almere, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Asthma. 2005 Jul-Aug;42(6):419-23. doi: 10.1081/JAS-67934.

Abstract

A new method to assess bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) using a single concentration methacholine has already been validated in adults with asthma. Because the geometrical dimensions of the airways in children are different, the results from studies in adults cannot be extrapolated to children. In this study, we validated the single concentration methacholine inhalation provocation test (SCIPT) in children. Twenty-two children performed three methacholine inhalation challenge tests in random order. Two challenges were performed according to the SCIPT: doubling doses (0.03-1.8 mg; maximal cumulated dose 3.6 mg) were administered with an Aerosol Provocation System (Masterscope, Jaeger). The third challenge was performed according to a standard dosimeter method (SDM): doubling doses (0.002-1.8 mg; maximal cumulative dose 3.5 mg) were administered with a DeVillbiss 646 nebulizer. The degree of BHR is expressed as a PD20. A difference of < 1.5 dose step was assumed to be due to intraindividual variation. We found an intraclass correlation of 0.91 between both tests according to the SCIPT and of 0.80 between the SCIPT and SDM. We found, according to the method of Bland and Altman, good agreement when comparing these two challenge tests. The single concentration inhalation provocation test is reproducible and shows good agreement with a standard dosimeter method to test bronchial responsiveness in children.

摘要

一种使用单一浓度乙酰甲胆碱评估支气管高反应性(BHR)的新方法已在成年哮喘患者中得到验证。由于儿童气道的几何尺寸不同,成人研究的结果不能外推至儿童。在本研究中,我们在儿童中验证了单一浓度乙酰甲胆碱吸入激发试验(SCIPT)。22名儿童按随机顺序进行了三次乙酰甲胆碱吸入激发试验。两次激发试验按照SCIPT进行:使用气溶胶激发系统(Masterscope,耶格公司)给予双倍剂量(0.03 - 1.8毫克;最大累积剂量3.6毫克)。第三次激发试验按照标准剂量计法(SDM)进行:使用德维比斯646雾化器给予双倍剂量(0.002 - 1.8毫克;最大累积剂量3.5毫克)。BHR程度以PD20表示。剂量步长差异<1.5被认为是个体内变异所致。我们发现,按照SCIPT进行的两种试验之间的组内相关性为0.91,SCIPT与SDM之间的组内相关性为0.80。根据布兰德和奥特曼方法,我们发现比较这两种激发试验时一致性良好。单一浓度吸入激发试验具有可重复性,并且与标准剂量计法在测试儿童支气管反应性方面显示出良好的一致性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验