Suppr超能文献

越来越多的文献支持对肾外伤进行观察等待(保守)治疗——一项系统评价。

The literature increasingly supports expectant (conservative) management of renal trauma--a systematic review.

作者信息

Santucci Richard A, Fisher Mark B

机构信息

Urology, Detroit Receiving Hospital, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma. 2005 Aug;59(2):493-503. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000179956.55078.c0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The perfect degree of operative intervention in renal trauma is unknown. However, expectant management for most blunt renal trauma is the standard of care, and nonoperative management is increasingly accepted for stab wounds. The best treatment of gunshot wounds and vascular injuries is still unclear; however, recent data indicates that a trial of nonoperative therapy may be warranted in those not exsanguinating from the kidney. Conservative management has many benefits, the greatest of which is decreasing the rate of iatrogenic nephrectomy. We have reviewed the world's literature to determine the level of support for expectant management of renal injury.

METHODS

The English language literature concerning renal trauma was identified with the assistance of Medline, and additional cited works not picked up in the initial search were obtained. One hundred and ten citations were ultimately reviewed dating back to 1947.

RESULTS

Most modern citations support at least a trial of expectant management for renal trauma patients not exsanguinating from the kidney, and without ureteral or renal pelvis injuries. The treatment of renovascular injuries has less consensus, but it appears that 'conservative' management by the application of nephrectomy is often the best approach, although renovascular repair may be attempted in rare cases.

CONCLUSION

Dozens of papers going back as far as 50 years seem to support the wider use of nonoperative therapy of renal injuries, although for unclear reasons, this approach is not yet universally accepted.

摘要

背景

肾创伤手术干预的理想程度尚不清楚。然而,对于大多数钝性肾创伤,期待治疗是标准的治疗方法,而对于刺伤,非手术治疗越来越被接受。枪伤和血管损伤的最佳治疗方法仍不明确;然而,最近的数据表明,对于那些没有因肾脏出血而危及生命的患者,进行非手术治疗试验可能是必要的。保守治疗有许多益处,其中最大的益处是降低医源性肾切除术的发生率。我们回顾了世界文献,以确定对肾损伤期待治疗的支持程度。

方法

在医学在线(Medline)的协助下,检索了有关肾创伤的英文文献,并获取了最初检索未找到的其他被引用文献。最终回顾了1947年以来的110篇文献。

结果

大多数现代文献支持对没有因肾脏出血而危及生命、且没有输尿管或肾盂损伤的肾创伤患者至少进行期待治疗试验。肾血管损伤的治疗共识较少,但似乎通过肾切除术进行“保守”治疗通常是最佳方法,尽管在极少数情况下可能尝试进行肾血管修复。

结论

追溯到50年前的几十篇论文似乎支持更广泛地使用肾损伤的非手术治疗,尽管原因不明,但这种方法尚未被普遍接受。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验