• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于耳蜗死区的临床观点:言语可懂度与主观助听器效益

A clinical perspective on cochlear dead regions: intelligibility of speech and subjective hearing aid benefit.

作者信息

Preminger Jill E, Carpenter Ryan, Ziegler Craig H

机构信息

University of Louisville School of Medicine, Program in Audiology, KY 40292, USA.

出版信息

J Am Acad Audiol. 2005 Sep;16(8):600-13; quiz 631-2. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.16.8.9.

DOI:10.3766/jaaa.16.8.9
PMID:16295247
Abstract

Using the threshold equalizing noise (TEN) test, 49 subjects with at least two pure-tone thresholds per ear greater than 50 dB HL and none greater than 80 dB HL were evaluated for the presence or absence of dead regions. The purpose of this study was to (1) assess the prevalence of cochlear dead regions in this clinical population, (2) measure whether listeners with dead regions performed differently than listeners without dead regions on a speech intelligibility in noise test, and (3) determine whether cochlear dead regions are associated with reduced subjective hearing aid performance. The results showed that (1) twenty-nine percent of the subjects tested positive for dead regions, (2) listeners with dead regions had poorer sentence understanding in noise than listeners without dead regions and (3) listeners with dead regions perceived poorer subjective hearing aid performance in listening environments with reverberation or background noise as compared to those without dead regions.

摘要

使用阈值均衡噪声(TEN)测试,对49名受试者进行了评估,这些受试者每只耳朵至少有两个纯音阈值大于50 dB HL且无大于80 dB HL的阈值,以确定是否存在死区。本研究的目的是:(1)评估该临床人群中耳蜗死区的患病率;(2)测量在噪声中的言语可懂度测试中,有死区的听者与无死区的听者表现是否不同;(3)确定耳蜗死区是否与主观助听器性能下降有关。结果显示:(1)29%的受试者死区测试呈阳性;(2)有死区的听者在噪声中的句子理解能力比无死区的听者差;(3)与无死区的听者相比,有死区的听者在有混响或背景噪声的聆听环境中主观感受到的助听器性能较差。

相似文献

1
A clinical perspective on cochlear dead regions: intelligibility of speech and subjective hearing aid benefit.关于耳蜗死区的临床观点:言语可懂度与主观助听器效益
J Am Acad Audiol. 2005 Sep;16(8):600-13; quiz 631-2. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.16.8.9.
2
Speech intelligibility benefits of hearing AIDS at various input levels.助听器在不同输入水平下对言语可懂度的益处。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2015 Mar;26(3):275-88. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.26.3.7.
3
Are There Cochlear Dead Regions Involved in Hearing Loss after Cisplatin Ototoxicity?顺铂耳毒性后听力损失是否涉及耳蜗死区?
Audiol Neurootol. 2019;24(5):253-257. doi: 10.1159/000502250. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
4
Cochlear dead regions in typical hearing aid candidates: prevalence and implications for use of high-frequency speech cues.典型助听器候选者中的耳蜗死区:流行情况及其对使用高频语音线索的影响。
Ear Hear. 2011 May-Jun;32(3):339-48. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318202e982.
5
A test for the diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea.一种用于诊断耳蜗中死亡区域的测试。
Br J Audiol. 2000 Aug;34(4):205-24. doi: 10.3109/03005364000000131.
6
Cochlear dead regions constrain the benefit of combining acoustic stimulation with electric stimulation.耳蜗死区限制了声刺激与电刺激联合使用的益处。
Ear Hear. 2014 Jul-Aug;35(4):410-7. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000032.
7
Evaluation of an aided TEN test for diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea.用于诊断耳蜗死区的辅助TEN测试评估
Ear Hear. 2008 Jun;29(3):392-400. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181690701.
8
Limiting high-frequency hearing aid gain in listeners with and without suspected cochlear dead regions.限制有和没有疑似耳蜗死区的听众的高频助听器增益。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2004 Jul-Aug;15(7):498-507. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.15.7.4.
9
Effects of low pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in noise for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies.低通滤波对有和没有高频死区的人群在噪声环境中语音可懂度的影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2002 Sep;112(3 Pt 1):1133-44. doi: 10.1121/1.1498853.
10
Semantic context improves speech intelligibility and reduces listening effort for listeners with hearing impairment.语义上下文可提高听力受损者的言语可懂度并减少其听力负担。
Int J Audiol. 2018 Jul;57(7):483-492. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2018.1432901. Epub 2018 Feb 7.

引用本文的文献

1
The acoustic change complex as a diagnostic tool for cochlear dead regions evaluated in normally hearing adults.声学变化复合体作为评估正常听力成年人耳蜗死区的诊断工具。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 7;15(1):24160. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02093-w.
2
Influence of Auditory Training on Acceptable Noise Level Scores in Elderly Persons with Hearing Impairment.听觉训练对听力障碍老年人可接受噪声级评分的影响。
Noise Health. 2022 Jul-Sep;24(114):166-172. doi: 10.4103/nah.nah_5_22.
3
Predicting the Cochlear Dead Regions Using a Machine Learning-Based Approach with Oversampling Techniques.
基于机器学习和过采样技术预测耳蜗死区。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Nov 2;57(11):1192. doi: 10.3390/medicina57111192.
4
Comparison of Frequency Transposition and Frequency Compression for People With Extensive Dead Regions in the Cochlea.比较广泛耳蜗死区患者的频率移调与频率压缩
Trends Hear. 2019 Jan-Dec;23:2331216518822206. doi: 10.1177/2331216518822206.
5
The Physiologic and Psychophysical Consequences of Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss.重度至极重度听力损失的生理和心理物理学后果
Semin Hear. 2018 Nov;39(4):349-363. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1670698. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
6
The Characteristics of Adults with Severe Hearing Loss.重度听力损失成年人的特征。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2018 Sep;29(8):764-779. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.17050.
7
Survey of Current Practice in the Fitting and Fine-Tuning of Common Signal-Processing Features in Hearing Aids for Adults.成人助听器常见信号处理功能适配与微调的当前实践调查
J Am Acad Audiol. 2018 Feb;29(2):118-124. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.16107.
8
Evaluation of a Frequency-Lowering Algorithm for Adults With High-Frequency Hearing Loss.成人高频听力损失低频算法评估。
Trends Hear. 2017 Jan-Dec;21:2331216517734455. doi: 10.1177/2331216517734455.
9
Listening Effort and Speech Recognition with Frequency Compression Amplification for Children and Adults with Hearing Loss.针对听力损失儿童和成人的频率压缩放大技术下的聆听努力与言语识别
J Am Acad Audiol. 2017 Oct;28(9):823-837. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.16158.
10
Processing Complex Sounds Passing through the Rostral Brainstem: The New Early Filter Model.处理通过延髓脑桥前部的复杂声音:新的早期滤波模型。
Front Neurosci. 2016 May 10;10:136. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00136. eCollection 2016.