Suppr超能文献

文献中所定义的护理教育与实践中的批判性思维。

Critical thinking in nursing education and practice as defined in the literature.

作者信息

Turner Phyllis

机构信息

East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA.

出版信息

Nurs Educ Perspect. 2005 Sep-Oct;26(5):272-7.

Abstract

Critical thinking is frequently discussed in nursing education and nursing practice literature. This article presents an analysis of the concept of critical thinking as it applies to nursing, differentiating its use in education and practice literature. Three computerized databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE, and EBSCO) were searched for the years 1981 to 2002, using the keywords critical thinking. References were stratified into two 11-year periods (1981-1991, 1992-2002) to identify changes in the concept over time and integration of the concept differentially into nursing education and nursing practice. A random sample of literature from each stratum was coded for definitions, attributes, surrogate terms, referents, antecedents, and consequences of critical thinking. Critical thinking as a nursing concept has matured since its first appearance in the literature. It is well defined and has clear characteristics. However, antecedents and consequences are not well defined, and many consequences are identical to attributes and surrogate terms. Additional work is needed to clarify the boundaries of the concept of critical thinking in nursing.

摘要

批判性思维在护理教育和护理实践文献中经常被讨论。本文对适用于护理领域的批判性思维概念进行了分析,区分了其在教育文献和实践文献中的应用。利用关键词“批判性思维”检索了1981年至2002年的三个计算机化数据库(CINAHL、MEDLINE和EBSCO)。参考文献被分为两个11年期(1981 - 1991年,1992 - 2002年),以确定该概念随时间的变化以及该概念在护理教育和护理实践中的差异整合情况。从每个层次中随机抽取文献样本,对批判性思维的定义、属性、替代术语、所指对象、前因和后果进行编码。批判性思维作为一个护理概念自首次出现在文献中以来已经成熟。它有明确的定义和清晰的特征。然而,前因和后果并没有得到很好的界定,而且许多后果与属性和替代术语相同。需要进一步开展工作来明确护理领域中批判性思维概念的边界。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验