Bernink P J, de Weerd P, ten C F, Remme W J, Barth J, Enthoven R, Haagen F D, Holwerda N J, Klomps H C
Department of Cardiology, Diakonessenhuis, Groningen, The Netherlands.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1991;17 Suppl 1:S53-6. doi: 10.1097/00005344-199117001-00017.
A multicenter, double-blind study was performed to compare the antianginal efficacy and safety of the new dihydropyridine calcium antagonist amlodipine with the benzothiazepine calcium antagonist diltiazem in patients with stable exertional angina pectoris. Following a 2-week placebo run-in period, 39 patients were randomized to receive amlodipine (2.5-10 mg once daily) and 41 patients to receive diltiazem (60-120 mg three times daily) in an 8-week double-blind treatment phase. The study used standardized bicycle exercise testing as a primary efficacy assessment. Patients also recorded angina frequency and nitroglycerin (NTG) tablet consumption/ week. Treatment with amlodipine and diltiazem resulted in an improvement in total exercise time, time to angina and total work, mean ST-segment deviation at maximum common load, median number of angina attacks/week, and NTG tablet consumption/week. The incidence and severity of possibly treatment-related side effects and laboratory test abnormalities were comparable for both drugs. The most frequently reported side effects were dizziness, headache, peripheral edema, and nausea. Two patients withdrew from diltiazem treatment due to pruritus in one case and severe headache and moderate dyspnea in the other. No amlodipine-treated patients withdrew due to side effects. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that the antianginal efficacy and tolerability of amlodipine is equivalent to diltiazem, but amlodipine has the advantage of once-daily dosing.
一项多中心、双盲研究开展,旨在比较新型二氢吡啶类钙拮抗剂氨氯地平和苯并硫氮䓬类钙拮抗剂地尔硫䓬在稳定型劳力性心绞痛患者中的抗心绞痛疗效和安全性。在为期2周的安慰剂导入期后,39例患者被随机分配接受氨氯地平(每日1次,2.5 - 10毫克),41例患者在为期8周的双盲治疗阶段接受地尔硫䓬(每日3次,60 - 120毫克)。该研究采用标准化自行车运动试验作为主要疗效评估方法。患者还记录每周的心绞痛发作频率和硝酸甘油片消耗量。氨氯地平和地尔硫䓬治疗均使总运动时间、心绞痛发作时间和总工作量、最大常见负荷时的平均ST段偏移量中位数、每周心绞痛发作次数中位数以及每周硝酸甘油片消耗量得到改善。两种药物可能与治疗相关的副作用和实验室检查异常的发生率及严重程度相当。最常报告的副作用为头晕、头痛、外周水肿和恶心。1例地尔硫䓬治疗患者因瘙痒退出治疗,另1例因严重头痛和中度呼吸困难退出治疗。无氨氯地平治疗患者因副作用退出。总之,本研究表明氨氯地平的抗心绞痛疗效和耐受性与地尔硫䓬相当,但氨氯地平具有每日给药1次的优势。