Suppr超能文献

氨氯地平每日一次与地尔硫䓬缓释片每日两次治疗稳定型心绞痛的对比研究。氨氯地平研究组。

A comparative study of once-daily amlodipine versus twice-daily diltiazem controlled release (CR) in the treatment of stable angina pectoris. Amlodipine Study Group.

作者信息

van Kesteren H A, Withagen A J

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Twee Steden Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1998 Oct;12 Suppl 3:233-7. doi: 10.1023/a:1007726109850.

Abstract

A multicenter, double-blind study was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of the calcium antagonists, amlodipine and diltiazem controlled release (CR), in patients with stable angina pectoris. One hundred and thirty-two patients were randomized to receive either amlodipine (5-10 mg) once daily or diltiazem CR (90-120 mg) twice daily for 8 weeks. A standard bicycle exercise tolerance test was used for the primary efficacy assessment. The median time to 1 mm ST-segment depression and time to onset of chest pain were increased by 16% (P < 0.0001) and 13% (P < 0.0001) with amlodipine, and by 16% (P < 0.0001) and 7% (P = 0.009) with diltiazem CR, respectively. Amlodipine, but not diltiazem CR, also produced a significant improvement in the median time to end of exercise of 5% (P < 0.0002), although the between-treatment difference for this parameter was not statistically significant. The number of angina attacks and nitroglycerin (NTG) tablet consumption were similar with both agents. Amlodipine was withdrawn in 3% and diltiazem CR in 9% of patients due to adverse events. The adverse events were reported by 15% of patients on amlodipine and 26% of those on diltiazem CR. The results from this study demonstrate that both drugs have a comparable therapeutic effect and possibly that amlodipine was better tolerated in patients with stable angina. Furthermore, amlodipine has the advantage of once-daily dosing and so may also be beneficial in ensuring good patient compliance.

摘要

进行了一项多中心、双盲研究,以比较钙拮抗剂氨氯地平和缓释地尔硫䓬在稳定型心绞痛患者中的疗效和安全性。132例患者被随机分为两组,一组每日服用一次氨氯地平(5 - 10毫克),另一组每日服用两次缓释地尔硫䓬(90 - 120毫克),为期8周。主要疗效评估采用标准的自行车运动耐量试验。氨氯地平组1毫米ST段压低的中位时间和胸痛发作时间分别增加了16%(P < 0.0001)和13%(P < 0.0001),缓释地尔硫䓬组分别增加了16%(P < 0.0001)和7%(P = 0.009)。氨氯地平组运动结束的中位时间也有显著改善,提高了5%(P < 0.0002),尽管该参数的组间差异无统计学意义。两种药物的心绞痛发作次数和硝酸甘油片消耗量相似。因不良事件,3%的患者停用氨氯地平,9%的患者停用缓释地尔硫䓬。服用氨氯地平的患者中有15%报告了不良事件,服用缓释地尔硫䓬的患者中有26%报告了不良事件。本研究结果表明,两种药物具有相当的治疗效果,并且在稳定型心绞痛患者中,氨氯地平的耐受性可能更好。此外,氨氯地平具有每日一次给药的优势,因此在确保患者良好的依从性方面可能也有益处。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验