Suppr超能文献

使用表达绿色荧光蛋白的烟曲霉分生孢子来验证对滤膜收集的空气样本进行的定量PCR分析。

Use of green fluorescent protein-expressing Aspergillus fumigatus conidia to validate quantitative PCR analysis of air samples collected on filters.

作者信息

McDevitt James J, Lees Peter S J, Merz William G, Schwab Kellogg J

机构信息

Department of Environmental Health Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA.

出版信息

J Occup Environ Hyg. 2005 Dec;2(12):633-40. doi: 10.1080/15459620500391650.

Abstract

This study used green fluorescent protein (GFP)-expressing Aspergillus fumigatus conidia to compare quantitative PCR (qPCR) enumeration with direct epifluorescent microscopic filter counts of conidia collected on filters in a test chamber. In separate experiments this study initially compared white versus fluorescent light microscopy for counting A. fumigatus conidia, then compared fluorescent microscopy counting of corresponding filter halves, and finally compared qPCR enumeration to counting by fluorescent light microscopy. The use of GFP-expressing conidia with epifluorescent microscopy yielded significantly higher conidia counts (p = 0.026, n = 41, mean of 4.1 conidia per counting field) and 40% faster counting times when compared to conventional counting using white light microscopy. GFP-expressing conidia were aerosolized in a test chamber and collected onto filters. Filters were divided in half and GFP-expressing conidia enumerated. There was no significant difference in the average conidia count per field between corresponding filter halves (p = 0.3, n = 9 filters, mean of 7.8 conidia per counting field). Thus, one filter half could be counted optically and would provide a reliable estimate of filter loading of the corresponding half, which could then be analyzed by qPCR. Filters (n = 38) loaded with GFP conidia in the aerosol chamber were divided in half and analyzed by either fluorescent microscopy or qPCR. The estimated filter loadings ranged from 15-30,000 conidia per filter. There was a linear relationship with a nearly 1:1 ratio between qPCR and direct microscopic estimates of filter loading (y = 1.06x + 404; R(2) = 0.91) showing that the outlined qPCR analysis method is in agreement with an external reference method and is reliable for enumerating A. fumigatus conidia collected on filters. The comparative data derived using GFP-expressing conidia confirmed that qPCR provides sensitive and accurate quantification of DNA from airborne conidia collected on filters.

摘要

本研究使用表达绿色荧光蛋白(GFP)的烟曲霉分生孢子,将定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)计数与在试验箱中收集于滤膜上的分生孢子的直接落射荧光显微镜滤膜计数进行比较。在单独的实验中,本研究首先比较了白色光与荧光显微镜用于计数烟曲霉分生孢子的情况,接着比较了相应滤膜两半的荧光显微镜计数,最后将qPCR计数与荧光显微镜计数进行比较。与使用白色光显微镜的传统计数相比,使用表达GFP的分生孢子结合落射荧光显微镜可产生显著更高的分生孢子计数(p = 0.026,n = 41,每个计数视野平均4.1个分生孢子),且计数时间快40%。将表达GFP的分生孢子雾化于试验箱中并收集到滤膜上。将滤膜分成两半并对表达GFP的分生孢子进行计数。相应滤膜两半之间每个视野的平均分生孢子计数无显著差异(p = 0.3,n = 9张滤膜,每个计数视野平均7.8个分生孢子)。因此,可以对滤膜的一半进行光学计数,并能可靠估计相应另一半的滤膜负载量,然后可通过qPCR进行分析。将在气溶胶箱中负载有GFP分生孢子的滤膜(n = 38)分成两半,通过荧光显微镜或qPCR进行分析。估计的滤膜负载量范围为每张滤膜15 - 30,000个分生孢子。qPCR与滤膜负载量的直接显微镜估计之间存在线性关系,比例接近1:1(y = 1.06x + 404;R(2) = 0.91),表明所概述的qPCR分析方法与外部参考方法一致,且对于计数收集在滤膜上的烟曲霉分生孢子是可靠的。使用表达GFP的分生孢子得出的比较数据证实,qPCR能对收集在滤膜上的空气传播分生孢子的DNA进行灵敏且准确的定量。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验