Podranski Tobias, Bouillon Thomas, Schumacher Peter M, Taguchi Akikio, Sessler Daniel I, Kurz Andrea
*Department of Anesthesiology, University of Bern, Switzerland; †Department of Anesthesia, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri; ‡Outcomes Research™ Institute, University of Louisville, Kentucky.
Anesth Analg. 2005 Dec;101(6):1695-1699. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000184184.40504.F3.
Dantrolene is the only drug proven effective for prevention and treatment of malignant hyperthermia (MH). Current dosing recommendations are based on noncompartmental analyses and are largely empiric. They are also divergent, as evidenced by differing recommendations from the Malignant Hyperthermia Association of the United States (MHAUS) and European Sources. We determined the compartmental pharmacokinetics of dantrolene, simulated the concentration time course based on currently recommended dosing, and suggest an optimal regimen. Nine volunteers (55-89 kg) received IV infusions of dantrolene (5 mg/kg over 30 min followed by 0.05 mg.kg(-1) . h(-1) for 5 h). Venous blood samples were drawn for up to 60 h, and dantrolene plasma concentrations were determined by reverse phase, high-performance liquid chromatography. One, two, and three compartmental models were fitted to the data, and a covariate analysis was performed. All calculations were performed with NONMEM using the population approach. The data were adequately described by a two-compartment model with the following typical variable values (median +/- se): volumes of distribution V1= 3.24 +/- 0.61 L; V2= 22.9 +/- 1.53 L; plasma clearance CL el= 0.03 +/- 0.003 L/min; and distributional clearance CL dist= 1.24 +/- 0.22 L/min. All parameters were scaled linearly with weight. Simulations of European recommendations for treatment of MH lead to plasma concentrations converging to 14-18 mg/L within 24 h. Simulating MHAUS guidelines (intermittent bolus administration) yielded peak and trough plasma concentrations ranging from 6.7-22.6 mg/L. Based on our findings, we propose an infusion regimen adjusted to the initial bolus dose(s) required to control symptoms. This strategy maintains the individualized therapeutic concentrations and improves stability of plasma concentrations.
丹曲林是唯一被证实对预防和治疗恶性高热(MH)有效的药物。目前的给药建议基于非房室分析,且大多是经验性的。这些建议也存在分歧,美国恶性高热协会(MHAUS)和欧洲资料来源给出的不同建议就证明了这一点。我们确定了丹曲林的房室药代动力学,根据目前推荐的给药方案模拟了浓度-时间过程,并提出了一种优化方案。9名志愿者(体重55 - 89千克)接受了静脉输注丹曲林(30分钟内输注5毫克/千克,随后以0.05毫克·千克⁻¹·小时⁻¹的速度输注5小时)。在长达60小时内采集静脉血样,通过反相高效液相色谱法测定丹曲林血浆浓度。将一室、二室和三室模型拟合到数据上,并进行协变量分析。所有计算均使用NONMEM采用群体方法进行。数据由二室模型充分描述,具有以下典型变量值(中位数±标准误):分布容积V1 = 3.24 ± 0.61升;V2 = 22.9 ± 1.53升;血浆清除率CLel = 0.03 ± 0.003升/分钟;分布清除率CLdist = 1.24 ± 0.22升/分钟。所有参数均与体重呈线性比例关系。对欧洲治疗MH的建议进行模拟,结果显示血浆浓度在24小时内收敛至14 - 18毫克/升。模拟MHAUS指南(间歇性推注给药)产生的血浆峰浓度和谷浓度范围为6.7 - 22.6毫克/升。基于我们的研究结果,我们提出一种根据控制症状所需的初始推注剂量进行调整的输注方案。该策略可维持个体化治疗浓度并提高血浆浓度的稳定性。