Stenestrand Ulf, Lindbäck Johan, Wallentin Lars
Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Linköping, Sweden.
Circulation. 2005 Nov 22;112(21):3225-31. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.552984.
The American and European guidelines do not agree with regard to antithrombotic treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI), thus causing uncertainty among physicians. We investigated the prescription of oral anticoagulation (OAC) in patients discharged alive with AF after an AMI and the influence of OAC treatment on 1-year mortality.
This was a prospective cohort study using data from the Register of Information and Knowledge about Swedish Heart Intensive care Admissions (RIKS-HIA) on patients admitted to the coronary care units of 72 Swedish hospitals from 1995 to 2002. A total of 6182 patients discharged alive with first registry-recorded AMI and AF on discharge ECG were included. One-year mortality data were obtained from the Swedish National Cause of Death Register. Only 30% (n=1848) of the 6182 patients with AF were prescribed OAC. At 1 year, the unadjusted mortality was 31% (1183 deaths) in the platelet-inhibitors only group and 22% (414 deaths) in the OAC-treated group. In Cox regression analysis with adjustment for confounding factors, OAC treatment was associated with a reduction in 1-year mortality (relative risk 0.73; 95% CI 0.62 to 0.86; P<0.001) in hospital survivors of AMI with AF. The reduction in mortality appeared to be caused primarily by a lower rate of ischemic heart death (55.6% versus 62.0%) and fatal stroke (5.7% versus 7.5%) in the OAC group. This reduction of mortality was similar among most subgroups based on age, sex, baseline characteristics, previous disease manifestations, and medications.
In daily clinical practice, OAC was only given to a minority (30%) of AMI patients with AF, despite the fact that OAC was associated with a 29% relative and 7% absolute reduction in 1-year mortality after adjustment for confounding variables. The results emphasize the importance of OAC treatment for AF after AMI.
美国和欧洲的指南对于心房颤动(AF)合并急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者的抗栓治疗意见不一致,这使得医生们感到困惑。我们调查了AMI后存活出院的AF患者口服抗凝药(OAC)的处方情况以及OAC治疗对1年死亡率的影响。
这是一项前瞻性队列研究,使用了瑞典心脏重症监护入院信息与知识登记册(RIKS-HIA)中1995年至2002年期间瑞典72家医院冠心病监护病房收治患者的数据。总共纳入了6182例首次登记记录的AMI且出院心电图显示有AF并存活出院的患者。1年死亡率数据来自瑞典国家死亡原因登记册。6182例AF患者中只有30%(n = 1848)接受了OAC治疗。1年后,仅接受血小板抑制剂治疗组的未调整死亡率为31%(1183例死亡),OAC治疗组为22%(414例死亡)。在对混杂因素进行调整的Cox回归分析中,OAC治疗与AMI合并AF的住院幸存者1年死亡率降低相关(相对风险0.73;95%置信区间0.62至0.86;P<0.001)。死亡率降低似乎主要是由于OAC组缺血性心脏病死亡(55.6%对62.0%)和致命性卒中(5.7%对7.5%)发生率较低。基于年龄、性别、基线特征、既往疾病表现和用药情况的大多数亚组中,死亡率降低情况相似。
在日常临床实践中,尽管调整混杂变量后OAC与1年死亡率相对降低29%和绝对降低7%相关,但只有少数(30%)AMI合并AF的患者接受了OAC治疗。结果强调了OAC治疗AMI后AF的重要性。