Bushby Nathan, Fitzgerald Mark, Cameron Peter, Marasco Silvana, Bystrzycki Adam, Rosenfeld Jeffrey V, Bailey Michael
Emergency and Trauma Centre, The Alfred, Prahran, Victoria, Australia.
Emerg Med Australas. 2005 Oct-Dec;17(5-6):443-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2005.00775.x.
Application of the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) to a trauma population identifies patients with 'unexpected survival'. This study used TRISS analysis to identify 'unexpected survivors' suffering major thoracic trauma, who survived to hospital discharge. Further analysis determined prehospital interventions that appeared to contribute to 'unexpected survival'.
The present study was a single-centre, retrospective case review with comparative statistical analysis. Patients were identified from the Alfred Trauma Registry between 1 July 2002 and 30 June 2003.
There were 336 adult trauma patients treated at The Alfred Trauma Centre with an Injury Severity Score >15 (major trauma) and at least one thoracic Anatomical Injury Score of 3 (severe) or greater. Of the eligible patients, 322/336 (95.8%, 95%[confidence interval] CI 95.1-96.5%) had complete data available for analysis. The study population mortality was 42/322 (13.0%, 95% CI 12.3-13.7%). There were 20 'unexpected survivors' (5.9%) and 5 (1.5%) 'unexpected deaths' on TRISS analysis. Chest decompression and/or endotracheal intubation prehospital was performed on 16/20 'unexpected survivors'. GCS for 'unexpected survivors' and 'expected deaths' (3.8 vs 3.5, P = 0.27) was not a predictor of survival. Respiratory rate per minute (16.2 vs 8.8, P = 0.01) and systolic blood pressure - mmHg (98 vs 80, P = 0.03) were significantly greater in the 'unexpected survivors' group compared with the 'expected death' group.
For patients sustaining severe thoracic blunt trauma, prehospital intubation and chest decompression appear to be associated with unexpected survival. A low GCS at scene is not predictive of 'unexpected survival' or 'expected death'.
将创伤和损伤严重程度评分(TRISS)应用于创伤人群可识别出“意外存活”的患者。本研究采用TRISS分析来识别遭受严重胸部创伤且存活至出院的“意外幸存者”。进一步分析确定了似乎有助于“意外存活”的院前干预措施。
本研究为单中心回顾性病例审查并进行比较统计分析。患者从2002年7月1日至2003年6月30日期间的阿尔弗雷德创伤登记处中识别。
阿尔弗雷德创伤中心治疗了336例成年创伤患者,其损伤严重程度评分>15(重伤)且至少有一项胸部解剖损伤评分为3(严重)或更高。在符合条件的患者中,322/336(95.8%,95%[置信区间]CI 95.1 - 96.5%)有完整数据可供分析。研究人群死亡率为42/322(13.0%,95%CI 12.3 - 13.7%)。TRISS分析中有20例“意外幸存者”(5.9%)和5例(1.5%)“意外死亡”。16/20例“意外幸存者”在院前进行了胸部减压和/或气管插管。“意外幸存者”和“预期死亡者”的格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分(3.8对3.5,P = 0.27)不是生存的预测因素。与“预期死亡”组相比,“意外幸存者”组每分钟呼吸频率(16.2对8.8,P = 0.01)和收缩压 - 毫米汞柱(98对80,P = 0.03)显著更高。
对于遭受严重胸部钝性创伤的患者,院前插管和胸部减压似乎与意外存活相关。现场格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分低并不能预测“意外存活”或“预期死亡”。