Suppr超能文献

使用现场生命体征可改善气管插管创伤患者的TRISS预测生存率。

Use of scene vital signs improves TRISS predicted survival in intubated trauma patients.

作者信息

Voskresensky Igor V, Rivera-Tyler Tanya, Dossett Lesly A, Riordan William P, Cotton Bryan A

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee 37212, USA.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2009 Jun 1;154(1):105-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2008.04.010. Epub 2008 May 6.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Trauma Related Injury Severity Score (TRISS) has been previously validated to predict outcomes in nonintubated, nonparalyzed trauma patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of scene vital signs on predicting survival in intubated trauma patients.

METHODS

Our Trauma Registry of the American College of Surgeons was reviewed for all trauma patients admitted between 10/01/04 and 09/30/06, arriving by aeromedical transport. TRISS was evaluated for each patient based on their (1) scene vital signs and (2) arrival vital signs. Additionally, the "TRISS-like" score was calculated for each patient. Expected mortality for each score was measured against observed mortality.

RESULTS

Four thousand four hundred ninety-nine Trauma Registry of the American College of Surgeons patients were admitted during the study period; 695 (15%) were transported by air; 163 patients (23%) arrived intubated; 480 arrived nonintubated. Observed survival in the intubated group was 76%. Observed survival in the nonintubated group was 100%. TRISS using scene vital signs more closely predicted mortality among intubated patients than the other scoring systems (69% versus 39% using TRISS-arrival versus 80% using TRISS-like). Scene vital signs with TRISS also resulted in fewer "unexpected" outcomes (survivors and deaths).

CONCLUSIONS

Traditionally, patients arriving at trauma centers intubated are either excluded from the trauma registry or have their physiological score "modified" to account for pharmacologically altered respiratory rate and Glasgow Coma Scale. In intubated patients, TRISS using scene vital signs more reliably predicts survival and does so with far fewer "unexpected" outcomes than with other available scoring systems.

摘要

引言

创伤相关损伤严重程度评分(TRISS)此前已被验证可用于预测未插管、未瘫痪创伤患者的预后。本研究的目的是评估现场生命体征对预测插管创伤患者生存情况的影响。

方法

回顾了美国外科医师学会创伤登记处2004年10月1日至2006年9月30日期间收治的所有通过空中医疗转运入院的创伤患者。根据每位患者的(1)现场生命体征和(2)入院时生命体征对TRISS进行评估。此外,还为每位患者计算了“类TRISS”评分。将每个评分的预期死亡率与观察到的死亡率进行比较。

结果

在研究期间,美国外科医师学会创伤登记处共收治了4499例患者;695例(15%)通过空中转运;163例患者(23%)入院时已插管;480例入院时未插管。插管组的观察到的生存率为76%。未插管组的观察到的生存率为100%。与其他评分系统相比,使用现场生命体征的TRISS能更准确地预测插管患者的死亡率(分别为69%、39%和80%,其中TRISS-入院时为39%,类TRISS为80%)。结合TRISS的现场生命体征还能减少“意外”结果(生存和死亡)的发生。

结论

传统上,入院时已插管的创伤患者要么被排除在创伤登记之外,要么对其生理评分进行“修正”,以考虑药物引起的呼吸频率和格拉斯哥昏迷量表变化。在插管患者中,使用现场生命体征的TRISS能更可靠地预测生存情况,且与其他现有评分系统相比,“意外”结果要少得多。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验