Petersen Wolf, Lenschow Simon, Weimann Andre, Strobel Michael J, Raschke Michael J, Zantop Thore
Department of Trauma-, Hand-, and Reconstructive Surgery, Wilhelms University Muenster, Waldeyerstr. 1, D-48149 Muenster, Germany.
Am J Sports Med. 2006 Mar;34(3):456-63. doi: 10.1177/0363546505281239. Epub 2005 Nov 22.
Previous studies have identified the femoral attachment of the posterior cruciate ligament fibers as one of the primary determinants of fiber tension behavior. In addition, a double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction has been shown to restore the intact knee kinematics more closely than does a single-bundle reconstruction.
An anterior tunnel position in double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction restores the biomechanics of the normal knee more closely than does a posterior tunnel position.
Controlled laboratory study.
Kinematics and in situ forces of human knees after double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with 2 different femoral tunnel positions (anterior vs posterior) were evaluated using a robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system. Within the same specimen, the resulting knee kinematics and in situ forces were compared. For statistical analysis, 2-way analysis of variance repeated measures were performed.
The femoral tunnel position of the double-bundle hamstring graft had significant effect on the resulting posterior tibial displacement and in situ forces of the hamstring grafts. The anterior femoral tunnel position provided significantly less posterior tibial translation than did the posterior tunnel position. There was a tendency toward higher in situ forces of grafts fixed in the anterior tunnel when compared to the posterior position, but this difference was statistically not significant.
An anterior position of the bone tunnels in double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction restores the normal knee kinematics more closely than does a posterior position of the tunnels.
In double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, posterior placement of the tunnel should be avoided.
先前的研究已确定后交叉韧带纤维的股骨附着点是纤维张力行为的主要决定因素之一。此外,双束后交叉韧带重建已被证明比单束重建能更接近地恢复完整膝关节的运动学。
双束后交叉韧带重建中,前隧道位置比后隧道位置能更接近地恢复正常膝关节的生物力学。
对照实验室研究。
使用机器人/通用力-力矩传感器测试系统评估采用两种不同股骨隧道位置(前侧与后侧)进行双束后交叉韧带重建后人膝关节的运动学和原位力。在同一样本内,比较所得的膝关节运动学和原位力。进行双向方差分析重复测量以进行统计分析。
双束腘绳肌移植物的股骨隧道位置对所得的胫骨后移和腘绳肌移植物的原位力有显著影响。股骨前隧道位置比后隧道位置提供的胫骨后移明显更少。与后隧道位置相比,固定在前隧道的移植物原位力有更高的趋势,但这种差异在统计学上不显著。
双束后交叉韧带重建中骨隧道的前位置比隧道的后位置能更接近地恢复正常膝关节运动学。
在双束后交叉韧带重建中,应避免隧道的后位放置。