Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Am J Sports Med. 2010 Apr;38(4):713-20. doi: 10.1177/0363546509353406. Epub 2010 Feb 5.
Anatomical reconstruction techniques that can restore normal joint kinematics without increasing surgical complications could potentially improve clinical outcomes and help manage anterior cruciate ligament injuries more efficiently.
Single-tunnel double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with anatomical placement of hamstring tendon graft can more closely restore normal knee anterior-posterior, medial-lateral, and internal-external kinematics than can conventional single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Controlled laboratory study.
Kinematic responses after single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and single-tunnel double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with anatomical placement of hamstring tendon graft were compared with the intact knee in 9 fresh-frozen human cadaveric knee specimens using a robotic testing system. Kinematics of each knee were determined under an anterior tibial load (134 N), a simulated quadriceps load (400 N), and combined torques (10 N.m valgus and 5 N.m internal tibial torques) at 0 degrees , 15 degrees , 30 degrees , 60 degrees , and 90 degrees of flexion.
Anterior tibial translations were more closely restored to the intact knee level after single-tunnel double-bundle reconstruction with anatomical placement of hamstring tendon graft than with a single-bundle reconstruction under the 3 external loading conditions. Under simulated quadriceps load, the mean internal tibial rotations after both reconstructions were lower than that of the anterior cruciate ligament-intact knee with no significant differences between these 3 knee conditions at 0 degrees and 30 degrees of flexion (P > .05). The increased medial tibial shifts of the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees were restored to the intact level by both reconstruction techniques under the 3 external loading conditions.
Single-tunnel double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with anatomical placement of hamstring tendon graft can better restore the anterior knee stability compared with a conventional single-bundle reconstruction. Both reconstruction techniques are efficient in restoring the normal medial-lateral stability but overcorrect the internal tibial rotations.
Single-tunnel double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with anatomical placement of hamstring tendon graft could provide improved clinical outcomes over a conventional single-bundle reconstruction.
能够恢复正常关节运动学而不增加手术并发症的解剖重建技术可能会改善临床结果,并帮助更有效地管理前交叉韧带损伤。
与传统的单束前交叉韧带重建相比,采用解剖学定位的腘绳肌腱重建的单隧道双束前交叉韧带重建可以更紧密地恢复正常的膝关节前后、内外运动学。
对照实验室研究。
使用机器人测试系统,对 9 个新鲜冷冻的人体尸体膝关节标本进行单束前交叉韧带重建和采用解剖学定位的腘绳肌腱重建的单隧道双束前交叉韧带重建后的运动学反应与完整膝关节进行比较。在 0 度、15 度、30 度、60 度和 90 度屈曲时,在胫骨前负荷(134N)、模拟股四头肌负荷(400N)和组合扭矩(10N.m 外翻和 5N.m 胫骨内扭矩)下,测量每个膝关节的运动学。
在 3 种外部加载条件下,采用解剖学定位的腘绳肌腱重建的单隧道双束重建比单束重建更能恢复前胫骨平移接近完整膝关节水平。在模拟股四头肌负荷下,两种重建后膝关节的平均胫骨内旋均低于前交叉韧带完整的膝关节,但在 0 度和 30 度屈曲时,这 3 种膝关节条件之间无显著性差异(P>.05)。在 3 种外部加载条件下,采用解剖学定位的腘绳肌腱重建的单隧道双束重建可以恢复前交叉韧带缺失膝关节的内侧胫骨移位增加到完整水平。
与传统的单束重建相比,采用解剖学定位的腘绳肌腱重建的单隧道双束前交叉韧带重建可以更好地恢复前膝关节稳定性。两种重建技术都能有效地恢复正常的内外稳定性,但过度矫正胫骨内旋。
与传统的单束前交叉韧带重建相比,采用解剖学定位的腘绳肌腱重建的单隧道双束前交叉韧带重建可能会提供更好的临床效果。