Grimaldi Leonardo, De Giorgio Fabio, Andreotta Pia, D'Alessio M Clara, Piscicelli Carlo, Pascali Vincenzo L
Institute of Legal Medicine, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2005 Dec;26(4):365-6. doi: 10.1097/01.paf.0000188083.15245.a5.
Perforation of the uterus is one of the most serious complications associated with insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUD). According to recent studies, this lesion occurs in 0.87 per 1000 cases, but statistics generally fluctuate between 0.05 and 13 per 1000 insertions. "Primary" perforations occur at the time of IUD insertion, and "secondary," or delayed, perforations are usually assumed to be caused by reactive uterine contractions. We report an unusual case of uterine perforation, which occurred 9 days after the insertion of a Multiload-Cu 375 IUD. The criteria for differential diagnosis between primary and secondary complications are discussed, particularly from the perspective of medical malpractice cases.
子宫穿孔是与宫内节育器(IUD)置入相关的最严重并发症之一。根据最近的研究,这种损伤每1000例中发生0.87例,但统计数据通常在每1000次置入0.05至13例之间波动。“原发性”穿孔发生在IUD置入时,而“继发性”或延迟性穿孔通常被认为是由子宫反应性收缩引起的。我们报告了一例不寻常的子宫穿孔病例,该病例发生在置入Multiload-Cu 375 IUD 9天后。讨论了原发性和继发性并发症鉴别诊断的标准,特别是从医疗事故案件的角度。