• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全球化、环境危害与进步:共识与责任的作用。

Globalisation, environmental harm, and progress: the role of consensus and liability.

作者信息

Zandvoort H

机构信息

Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Water Sci Technol. 2005;52(6):43-50.

PMID:16304933
Abstract

Two conditions are stated that must be fulfilled to make sure that the negative effects of environmental pollution and risks stemming from the spread of free markets and technology do not outweigh the beneficial effects of this development. (1) For all activities, all those who may experience the negative effects of the activities must have given their consent to the activities and the conditions under which they are performed. (2) Those who engage in activities without this consent must be held to unlimited and unconditional liability for the negative effects that the activities may cause for those who did not give their consent. These conditions are necessary principles for the responsible management of environmental harm and risks. If the conditions are not satisfied, then the belief that the global spread of free markets and technology is beneficial for all, or does not harm anyone, cannot be justified. Neither of the conditions is fulfilled at present. This is illustrated using examples drawn from international legislation regarding liability for oil transportation, energy production, genetically modified organisms and chemicals in the environment. Directions for improving existing liability legislation are identified. The relationship between the conditions and the precautionary principle is explained.

摘要

文中陈述了两个必须满足的条件,以确保环境污染的负面影响以及自由市场和技术传播所带来的风险不会超过这种发展的有益影响。(1)对于所有活动,所有可能受到活动负面影响的人必须已同意这些活动及其开展的条件。(2)未经这种同意而从事活动的人,必须对这些活动可能给未给予同意的人造成的负面影响承担无限和无条件的责任。这些条件是对环境危害和风险进行负责任管理的必要原则。如果这些条件得不到满足,那么认为自由市场和技术的全球传播对所有人都有益或不会伤害任何人的观点就无法成立。目前这两个条件都未得到满足。这一点通过从关于石油运输、能源生产、转基因生物和环境中化学品责任的国际立法中选取的例子得以说明。文中还确定了改进现有责任立法的方向。同时解释了这些条件与预防原则之间的关系。

相似文献

1
Globalisation, environmental harm, and progress: the role of consensus and liability.全球化、环境危害与进步:共识与责任的作用。
Water Sci Technol. 2005;52(6):43-50.
2
Recent development in the field of international liability regimes to tackle environmental risks.应对环境风险的国际责任制度领域的最新发展。
Water Sci Technol. 2005;52(6):51-7.
3
[Conclusions. The precautionary principle: its advantages and risks].[结论。预防原则:其优点与风险]
Bull Acad Natl Med. 2000;184(5):969-93.
4
Evaluation of legal liability for technological risks in view of requirements for peaceful coexistence and progress.从和平共处和进步的要求出发评价技术风险的法律责任。
Risk Anal. 2011 Jun;31(6):969-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01545.x. Epub 2010 Dec 22.
5
The precautionary principle and international conflict over domestic regulation: mitigating uncertainty and improving adaptive capacity.预防原则与国内监管引发的国际冲突:减轻不确定性并提高适应能力。
Water Sci Technol. 2005;52(6):59-64.
6
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
7
The alphabet soup of environmental regulations.
Tex Med. 1999 Oct;95(10):54-7.
8
Using risk assessment, benefit-cost analysis, and real options to implement a precautionary principle.运用风险评估、成本效益分析和实物期权来实施预防原则。
Risk Anal. 2004 Jun;24(3):727-35. doi: 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00471.x.
9
Reflections on uncertainty in risk assessment and risk management by the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) precautionary principle workgroup.环境毒理学与化学学会(SETAC)预防原则工作组对风险评估与风险管理中不确定性的思考。
Water Sci Technol. 2005;52(6):73-9.
10
Science and norms in policies for sustainable development: assessing and managing risks of chemical substances and genetically modified organisms in the European Union.可持续发展政策中的科学与规范:评估与管理欧盟化学物质和转基因生物的风险
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2006 Feb;44(1):49-56. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2005.04.010. Epub 2005 Oct 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Responsibility ascriptions in technology development and engineering: three perspectives.技术开发和工程中的责任归因:三个视角。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2012 Mar;18(1):69-90. doi: 10.1007/s11948-009-9189-3. Epub 2009 Dec 1.