Suppr超能文献

冠状动脉搭桥手术中的小型体外循环:对炎症和凝血的影响微乎其微,但安全边际丧失。

Miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass in coronary artery bypass surgery: marginal impact on inflammation and coagulation but loss of safety margins.

作者信息

Nollert Georg, Schwabenland Ina, Maktav Deniz, Kur Felix, Christ Frank, Fraunberger Peter, Reichart Bruno, Vicol Calin

机构信息

Clinic of Cardiac Surgery, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 Dec;80(6):2326-32. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.05.080.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Inflammation and coagulation disturbances are common consequences of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Recently, miniaturized closed CPB circuits without cardiotomy suction and venous reservoir have been proposed to reduce complication rates. We compared outcomes with conventional (CCPB) and miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass (MCPB) after coronary artery bypass operations (CABG) with respect to inflammation and coagulation.

DESCRIPTION

Thirty patients (23% female; aged 67.9 +/- 9.0 years) were prospectively randomly assigned to undergo isolated CABG with CCPB or MCPB. Conventional CPB had a pump prime of 1, 600 mL. Miniaturized CPB consisted of a centrifugal pump, arterial filter, heparinized tubing, and oxygenator with a priming volume of 800 mL. Shed blood was removed by a cell-saving device and reinfused. Measurements included interleukin (IL)-2 receptor, IL-6, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor receptor 55 and 75, C reactive protein, leukocyte differentiation, d-dimers, fibrinogen, and thrombocytes at six time points.

EVALUATION

In both groups no major complication occurred. However, two dangerous air leaks occurred in the closed MCPB circuit, demonstrating the narrow safety margins. Operative handling was also more difficult owing to limitations in venting and fluid management. International normalized ratio (p = 0.03) and antithrombin III (p = 0.04) levels were elevated during CPB in the CCPB group, most likely owing to differences of the intraoperative anticoagulation management. Repeated measures analysis revealed that not a single parameter of inflammation or clinical outcome showed significant differences among groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of a MCPB affected inflammation and coagulation variables only marginally and did not lead to clinical relevant changes as assessed by blood loss, need for blood products, and intensive care unit and clinical stays. However, safety margins for volume loss, air emboli, and weaning from CPB decrease, because of the closed MCPB circuit.

摘要

目的

炎症和凝血功能紊乱是体外循环(CPB)常见的后果。最近,有人提出采用无心脏切开吸引和静脉储血器的小型化闭合式CPB回路,以降低并发症发生率。我们比较了冠状动脉搭桥手术(CABG)后传统体外循环(CCPB)和小型化体外循环(MCPB)在炎症和凝血方面的结果。

描述

30例患者(23%为女性;年龄67.9±9.0岁)被前瞻性随机分配接受CCPB或MCPB下行单纯CABG。传统CPB的预充量为1600 mL。小型化CPB由离心泵、动脉滤器、肝素化管道和预充量为800 mL的氧合器组成。失血通过血液回收装置收集并回输。在六个时间点测量白细胞介素(IL)-2受体、IL-6、IL-10、肿瘤坏死因子受体55和75、C反应蛋白、白细胞分化、D-二聚体、纤维蛋白原和血小板。

评估

两组均未发生重大并发症。然而,闭合式MCPB回路中发生了两起危险的空气泄漏,表明安全边际较窄。由于排气和液体管理的限制,手术操作也更加困难。CCPB组在CPB期间国际标准化比值(p = 0.03)和抗凝血酶III(p = 0.04)水平升高,最可能是由于术中抗凝管理的差异。重复测量分析显示,炎症或临床结果的单一参数在各组之间均无显著差异。

结论

使用MCPB对炎症和凝血变量的影响很小,并且在失血、血液制品需求、重症监护病房停留时间和临床住院时间方面,未导致临床相关变化。然而,由于闭合式MCPB回路,容量损失、空气栓塞和脱离CPB的安全边际降低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验