De Stavola Bianca L, Nitsch Dorothea, dos Santos Silva Isabel, McCormack Valerie, Hardy Rebecca, Mann Vera, Cole Tim J, Morton Susan, Leon David A
Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Am J Epidemiol. 2006 Jan 1;163(1):84-96. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwj003. Epub 2005 Nov 23.
There is growing recognition that the risk of many diseases in later life, such as type 2 diabetes or breast cancer, is affected by adult as well as early-life variables, including those operating prior to conception and during the prenatal period. Most of these risk factors are correlated because of common biologic and/or social pathways, while some are intrinsically ordered over time. The study of how they jointly influence later ("distal") disease outcomes is referred to as life course epidemiology. This area of research raises several issues relevant to the current debate on causal inference in epidemiology. The authors give a brief overview of the main analytical and practical problems and consider a range of modeling approaches, their differences determined by the degree with which associations present (or presumed) among the correlated explanatory variables are explicitly acknowledged. Standard multiple regression (i.e., conditional) models are compared with joint models where more than one outcome is specified. Issues arising from measurement error and missing data are addressed. Examples from two cohorts in the United Kingdom are used to illustrate alternative modeling strategies. The authors conclude that more than one analytical approach should be adopted to gain more insight into the underlying mechanisms.
人们越来越认识到,许多晚年疾病(如2型糖尿病或乳腺癌)的风险受到成人期以及生命早期变量的影响,这些变量包括受孕前和孕期的因素。由于共同的生物学和/或社会途径,这些风险因素大多相互关联,而有些因素在时间上具有内在的先后顺序。研究它们如何共同影响后期(“远端”)疾病结局被称为生命历程流行病学。这一研究领域引发了一些与当前流行病学因果推断辩论相关的问题。作者简要概述了主要的分析和实际问题,并考虑了一系列建模方法,它们的差异取决于对相关解释变量之间存在(或假定)的关联的明确承认程度。将标准多元回归(即条件)模型与指定了多个结局的联合模型进行了比较。讨论了测量误差和缺失数据引发的问题。使用来自英国两个队列的例子来说明替代建模策略。作者得出结论,应采用不止一种分析方法,以更深入地了解潜在机制。