Maurer C, Mergner T, Peterka R J
Neurological University Clinic, Neurozentrum Breisacher Str. 64, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Exp Brain Res. 2006 May;171(2):231-50. doi: 10.1007/s00221-005-0256-y. Epub 2005 Nov 24.
The interaction of different orientation senses contributing to posture control is not well understood. We therefore performed experiments in which we measured the postural responses of normal subjects and vestibular loss patients during perturbation of their stance. Subjects stood on a motion platform with their eyes closed and auditory cues masked. The perturbing stimuli consisted of either platform tilts or external torque produced by force-controlled pull of the subjects' body on a stationary platform. Furthermore, we presented trials in which these two stimuli were applied when the platform was body-sway referenced (i.e., coupled 1:1 to body position, by which ankle joint proprioceptive feedback is essentially removed). We analyzed subjects' postural responses, i.e., the excursions of their center of mass (COM) and center of pressure (COP), using a systems analysis approach. We found gain and phase of the responses to vary as a function of stimulus frequency and in relation to the absence versus presence of vestibular and proprioceptive cues. In addition, gain depended on stimulus amplitude, reflecting a non-linearity in the control. The experimental results were compared to simulation results obtained from an 'inverted pendulum' model of posture control. In the model, sensor fusion mechanisms yield internal estimates of the external stimuli, i.e., of the external torque (pull), the platform tilt and gravity. These estimates are derived from three sensor systems: ankle proprioceptors, vestibular sensors and plantar pressure sensors (somatosensory graviceptors). They are fed as global set point signals into a local control loop of the ankle joints, which is based on proprioceptive negative feedback. This local loop stabilizes the body-on-foot support, while the set point signals upgrade the loop into a body-in-space control. Amplitude non-linearity was implemented in the model in the form of central threshold mechanisms. In model simulations that combined sensor fusion and thresholds, an automatic context-specific sensory re-weighting across stimulus conditions occurred. Model parameters were identified using an optimization procedure. Results suggested that in the sway-referenced condition normal subjects altered their postural strategy by strongly weighting feedback from plantar somatosensory force sensors. Taking this strategy change into account, the model's simulation results well paralleled all experimental results across all conditions tested.
不同方向感对姿势控制的相互作用尚未得到充分理解。因此,我们进行了实验,测量正常受试者和前庭功能丧失患者在站姿受扰动期间的姿势反应。受试者闭眼站在运动平台上,听觉提示被屏蔽。扰动刺激包括平台倾斜或通过力控拉动受试者身体在固定平台上产生的外部扭矩。此外,我们还进行了一些试验,即在平台以身体摆动为参考时(即与身体位置1:1耦合,这样踝关节本体感受反馈基本被消除)施加这两种刺激。我们使用系统分析方法分析受试者的姿势反应,即他们的质心(COM)和压力中心(COP)的偏移。我们发现反应的增益和相位会随着刺激频率以及前庭和本体感受线索的有无而变化。此外,增益取决于刺激幅度,反映了控制中的非线性。实验结果与从姿势控制的“倒立摆”模型获得的模拟结果进行了比较。在该模型中,传感器融合机制产生外部刺激的内部估计,即外部扭矩(拉力)、平台倾斜和重力的估计。这些估计来自三个传感器系统:踝关节本体感受器、前庭传感器和足底压力传感器(体感重力感受器)。它们作为全局设定点信号输入到基于本体感受负反馈的踝关节局部控制回路中。这个局部回路稳定身体在足部的支撑,而设定点信号将回路升级为身体在空间中的控制。幅度非线性以中央阈值机制的形式在模型中实现。在结合传感器融合和阈值的模型模拟中,出现了跨刺激条件的自动上下文特定感觉重新加权。使用优化程序确定模型参数。结果表明,在以摆动为参考的条件下,正常受试者通过强烈加权来自足底体感力传感器的反馈来改变他们的姿势策略。考虑到这种策略变化,模型的模拟结果在所有测试条件下都与所有实验结果非常吻合。