Suppr超能文献

粗针活检与细针穿刺活检:是否存在相似的取材及诊断问题?

Core needle biopsy versus fine needle aspiration biopsy: are there similar sampling and diagnostic issues?

作者信息

Masood Shahla

机构信息

University of Florida Health Science Center, Department of Pathology, Clinical Center, Jacksonville, FL 32209, USA.

出版信息

Clin Lab Med. 2005 Dec;25(4):679-88, vi. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2005.08.006.

Abstract

Evidence suggests that in experienced hands fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) is highly safe and effective for the evaluation of patients who have palpable breast lesions. In most cases, FNAB leads to an appropriate clinical or surgical management. FNAB can also be effectively used in evaluation of cystic lesions under ultrasound guidance. Other nonpalpable lesions can benefit from image-directed core needle biopsy (CNB). Overall, cost should influence the decision to use FNAB or CNB. FNAB may be the only affordable procedure in developing countries. Breast cancer affects significant numbers of women worldwide. Attempts should be made to take all the measures necessary to consider optimal approaches to breast health care for everyone regardless of age, race, ethnicity, or social status.

摘要

有证据表明,在经验丰富的医生操作下,细针穿刺活检(FNAB)对于评估可触及乳腺病变的患者来说是高度安全且有效的。在大多数情况下,FNAB能带来恰当的临床或手术处理方案。FNAB还可有效用于超声引导下囊性病变的评估。其他不可触及的病变则可通过影像引导下的粗针活检(CNB)获益。总体而言,成本应影响使用FNAB或CNB的决策。在发展中国家,FNAB可能是唯一经济实惠的检查方法。乳腺癌影响着全球大量女性。应努力采取一切必要措施,为每个人(无论年龄、种族、族裔或社会地位如何)考虑最佳的乳腺保健方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验