Mason Deanna J, Humphreys Glyn W, Kent Lindsey
School of Psychology, University of Exeter, UK.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2005 Dec;46(12):1345-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01428.x.
Previous work on visual selective attention in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) has utilised spatial search paradigms. This study compared ADHD to control children on a temporal search task using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (RSVP). In addition, the effects of irrelevant singleton distractors on search performance were examined.
In each condition, subjects reported the identity of a red letter 'probe' in a sequence of white letters which appeared one after the other at a central fixation point. The temporal position of the probe varied from an initial target, which was distinguished by surrounding asterisks. The target was reported in addition to the probe in condition 2, but not in the baseline condition 1. In a third condition, the initial target was not reported, but one of the asterisks appeared as a colour singleton on some trials.
All children displayed an 'attentional blink' with probe detection reduced when it appeared at close temporal relations relative to the target. This 'blink' reduced over time, and there were no group differences in the recovery of performance, although ADHD children made more errors overall. The ADHD group were also more vulnerable than controls to distraction from irrelevant singletons in condition 3.
Although the basic mechanisms of selective attention were not impaired in children with ADHD, these children appeared to require more resources to execute the task and were more vulnerable to distraction by irrelevant singletons, indicating deficits in the maintenance of attentional control.
先前关于注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)视觉选择性注意的研究采用了空间搜索范式。本研究使用快速序列视觉呈现(RSVP)在时间搜索任务中将多动症儿童与对照儿童进行比较。此外,还研究了无关单一干扰项对搜索性能的影响。
在每种情况下,受试者报告在中央注视点依次出现的一系列白色字母中红色字母“探测刺激”的身份。探测刺激的时间位置与初始目标不同,初始目标由周围的星号区分。在条件2中除了报告探测刺激外还报告目标,但在基线条件1中不报告目标。在第三种条件下,不报告初始目标,但在某些试验中其中一个星号作为颜色单一物出现。
所有儿童都表现出“注意瞬脱”,即当探测刺激出现在与目标接近的时间关系时,探测刺激的检测率降低。这种“瞬脱”随时间减少,尽管多动症儿童总体上错误更多,但在性能恢复方面没有组间差异。在条件3中,多动症组比对照组更容易受到无关单一物的干扰。
虽然多动症儿童的选择性注意基本机制没有受损,但这些儿童似乎需要更多资源来执行任务,并且更容易受到无关单一物的干扰,这表明在维持注意力控制方面存在缺陷。