• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保留神经的内镜下腹膜外根治性前列腺切除术——耻骨前列腺韧带保留对早期控尿和切缘阳性的影响

Nerve sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy--effect of puboprostatic ligament preservation on early continence and positive margins.

作者信息

Stolzenburg Jens-Uwe, Liatsikos Evangelos N, Rabenalt Robert, Do Minh, Sakelaropoulos George, Horn Lars Christian, Truss Michael C

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 20, 04103 Leipzig, Germany, and Department of Urology, University Hospital of Patras, Greece.

出版信息

Eur Urol. 2006 Jan;49(1):103-11; discussion 111-2. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.10.002. Epub 2005 Nov 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2005.10.002
PMID:16314031
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

A technical modification of nerve sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (nsEERPE) with preservation of the puboprostatic ligaments is presented and compared to a previous technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

nsEERPE was performed in 100 men with clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate from March 2004 through February 2005. Patients were divided into two groups: Group A included patients in whom a standard nsEERPE was performed (n=50), and group B included patients in whom a puboprostatic ligament sparing nsEERPE was performed (n=50). The postoperative follow-up was 2 weeks and 3 months evaluating preliminary effects on early continence and positive margins.

RESULTS

The early return to continence at 2 weeks postoperatively was achieved by 6 patients (12%) in group A, and 12 patients (24%) in group B. Three months after the procedure 24 (48%) and 38 (76%) patients were continent, in groups A and B respectively. Clinical outcome (early continence) was significantly better for Group B patients, at 2 weeks (chi-square test, p=0.0019) and at 3 months (chi-square test, p=0.0347) following surgery. No cases of complete or severe incontinence (more than 5 pads/day) were observed at 3 months after surgery, in either groups. Groups A and B did not exhibit significant differences regarding their histological status. In group A, positive margins were detected in 6.5% and 26.3% of patients with pT2 and pT3, respectively. In group B, positive margins were found in 3.2% and 15.8% of patients with pT2 and pT3, respectively

CONCLUSION

We propose the use of puboprostatic ligament-sparing nsEERPE as an intriguing method to ascertain recuperation of early continence after nerve sparing procedures, without hindering the final oncological outcome.

摘要

引言

本文介绍了一种保留耻骨前列腺韧带的保留神经内镜下腹膜外根治性前列腺切除术(nsEERPE)的技术改良,并与先前的技术进行比较。

材料与方法

2004年3月至2005年2月,对100例临床局限性前列腺腺癌男性患者实施了nsEERPE。患者分为两组:A组为接受标准nsEERPE的患者(n = 50),B组为接受保留耻骨前列腺韧带的nsEERPE的患者(n = 50)。术后随访2周和3个月,评估对早期控尿和切缘阳性的初步影响。

结果

术后2周,A组6例(12%)患者、B组12例(24%)患者实现了早期控尿。术后3个月,A组和B组分别有24例(48%)和38例(76%)患者实现控尿。B组患者的临床结局(早期控尿)在术后2周(卡方检验,p = 0.0019)和3个月(卡方检验,p = 0.0347)时明显更好。术后3个月,两组均未观察到完全或严重尿失禁(每天超过5片尿垫)的病例。A组和B组在组织学状态方面无显著差异。在A组中,pT2和pT3患者的切缘阳性率分别为6.5%和26.3%。在B组中,pT2和pT3患者的切缘阳性率分别为3.2%和15.8%。

结论

我们建议使用保留耻骨前列腺韧带的nsEERPE作为一种有趣的方法,以确定保留神经手术后早期控尿的恢复情况,而不影响最终的肿瘤学结局。

相似文献

1
Nerve sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy--effect of puboprostatic ligament preservation on early continence and positive margins.保留神经的内镜下腹膜外根治性前列腺切除术——耻骨前列腺韧带保留对早期控尿和切缘阳性的影响
Eur Urol. 2006 Jan;49(1):103-11; discussion 111-2. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.10.002. Epub 2005 Nov 2.
2
Intrafascial nerve-sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy.筋膜内保留神经的内镜下腹膜外根治性前列腺切除术
Urology. 2006 Jan;67(1):17-21. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.09.052.
3
A comparison of outcomes for interfascial and intrafascial nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.筋膜间和筋膜内神经保留根治性前列腺切除术的疗效比较。
Urology. 2010 Sep;76(3):743-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.03.089. Epub 2010 Jun 22.
4
Puboprostatic ligament sparing improves urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy.保留耻骨前列腺韧带可改善耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术后的尿失禁。
Urology. 1998 Jan;51(1):67-72. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(97)00479-2.
5
Role of bladder neck preservation in urinary continence following radical retropubic prostatectomy.膀胱颈保留在耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术后尿失禁中的作用。
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2004;38(1):32-7. doi: 10.1080/00365590310017280.
6
Intrafascial nerve-sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy.筋膜内保留神经的内镜下腹膜外根治性前列腺切除术
Eur Urol. 2008 May;53(5):931-40. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.11.047. Epub 2007 Dec 3.
7
The role of membranous urethral afferent autonomic innervation in the continence mechanism after nerve sparing radical prostatectomy: a clinical and prospective study.保留神经的根治性前列腺切除术后膜性尿道传入自主神经支配在控尿机制中的作用:一项临床前瞻性研究。
J Urol. 2008 Dec;180(6):2527-31. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.08.020. Epub 2008 Oct 19.
8
Does a nerve-sparing technique or potency affect continence after open radical retropubic prostatectomy?保留神经技术或性功能对开放性耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术后的控尿功能有影响吗?
BJU Int. 2008 Dec;102(11):1581-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07921.x. Epub 2008 Sep 18.
9
Anatomic restoration technique of continence mechanism and preservation of puboprostatic collar: a novel modification to achieve early urinary continence in men undergoing robotic prostatectomy.控尿机制的解剖修复技术及耻骨前列腺襻的保留:一种在接受机器人前列腺切除术的男性中实现早期尿控的新改良方法。
Urology. 2007 Apr;69(4):726-31. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.12.028.
10
Impact of nerve sparing technique on patient self-assessed outcomes after radical perineal prostatectomy.保留神经技术对根治性会阴前列腺切除术后患者自我评估结果的影响。
J Urol. 2007 Aug;178(2):488-92; discussion 492. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.100. Epub 2007 Jun 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of surgery versus radiotherapy in patients with localized prostate cancer in terms of urinary, bowel, and sexual domains.手术与放疗对局限性前列腺癌患者在泌尿、肠道和性功能方面的影响。
Cancer Med. 2023 Sep;12(17):18176-18188. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6395. Epub 2023 Jul 30.
2
Transperineal pelvic floor ultrasound in male.经会阴盆底超声检查(男)。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2023 Dec;55(12):3261-3268. doi: 10.1007/s11255-023-03617-x. Epub 2023 May 9.
3
The association between the parameters of uroflowmetry and lower urinary tract symptoms in prostate cancer patients after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
尿流率参数与机器人辅助前列腺根治术后前列腺癌患者下尿路症状的关系。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 6;17(10):e0275069. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275069. eCollection 2022.
4
Longer preserved urethral length in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy significantly contributes to post-operative urinary continence recovery.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中保留更长的尿道长度对术后尿失禁的恢复有显著作用。
BJUI Compass. 2021 Nov 12;3(2):184-190. doi: 10.1002/bco2.128. eCollection 2022 Mar.
5
Effect of puboprostatic ligament preservation during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy on early continence: Randomized controlled trial.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术中保留耻骨前列腺韧带对早期控尿的影响:随机对照试验
Asian J Urol. 2021 Jul;8(3):260-268. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2020.11.002. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
6
Recommendations on robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a Brazilian experts' consensus.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术推荐意见:巴西专家共识
J Robot Surg. 2021 Dec;15(6):829-839. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01186-0. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
7
Preoperative pelvic floor muscle exercise does not reduce the rate of postprostatectomy incontinence: evidence from a meta-analysis and a systematic review.术前盆底肌锻炼不能降低前列腺切除术后尿失禁的发生率:一项荟萃分析和系统评价的证据
Transl Androl Urol. 2020 Oct;9(5):2146-2156. doi: 10.21037/tau-20-684.
8
How to Prevent and Manage Post-Prostatectomy Incontinence: A Review.如何预防和处理前列腺切除术后尿失禁:综述
World J Mens Health. 2021 Oct;39(4):581-597. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.200114. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
9
Anatomical robotic prostatectomy: technical factors to achieve superb continence and erectile function.解剖性机器人前列腺切除术:实现卓越控尿和勃起功能的技术因素。
Transl Androl Urol. 2020 Apr;9(2):887-897. doi: 10.21037/tau.2020.01.15.
10
The location of the bladder neck in postoperative cystography predicts continence convalescence after radical prostatectomy.术后膀胱造影中膀胱颈的位置可预测根治性前列腺切除术后的控尿恢复情况。
BMC Urol. 2018 May 30;18(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12894-018-0370-3.