两份哮喘知识问卷的有效性和可靠性。
The validity and reliability of two asthma knowledge questionnaires.
作者信息
Kritikos Vicky, Krass Ines, Chan Hui Shen, Bosnic-Anticevich Sinthia Z
机构信息
Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
出版信息
J Asthma. 2005 Nov;42(9):795-801. doi: 10.1080/02770900500308627.
BACKGROUND
This study aimed to develop and validate two asthma knowledge questionnaires, one for consumers (CQ) and one for health care professionals (HQ) to fill an existing gap in the literature.
METHODS
Following development and pilot testing, the revised CQ and HQ were administered to respiratory physicians, pharmacists and people with asthma and without asthma.
RESULTS
Both the CQ and HQ were shown to be reliable with Cronbach's alpha of 0.78 and 0.92 respectively. Both were also found to have good content, face, construct and discriminant validity.
CONCLUSION
The CQ and HQ were shown to be simple, valid and reliable instruments for the assessment of asthma knowledge of consumers and health care professionals and to direct educational resources more appropriately. Future research will evaluate the utility of these instruments in clinical practice.
背景
本研究旨在开发并验证两份哮喘知识问卷，一份供消费者填写（CQ），另一份供医疗保健专业人员填写（HQ），以填补文献中的现有空白。
方法
经过开发和预测试后，将修订后的CQ和HQ分发给呼吸内科医生、药剂师以及患有和未患有哮喘的人群。
结果
CQ和HQ均显示出可靠性，Cronbach's α系数分别为0.78和0.92。两者还具有良好的内容效度、表面效度、结构效度和区分效度。
结论
CQ和HQ被证明是评估消费者和医疗保健专业人员哮喘知识的简单、有效且可靠的工具，能够更合理地分配教育资源。未来的研究将评估这些工具在临床实践中的效用。
Zotero 插件