Suppr超能文献

大麻使用与精神病症状或抑郁症之间的因果关系。我们应该观望吗?一种公共卫生视角。

Causal relationship between cannabis use and psychotic symptoms or depression. Should we wait and see? A public health perspective.

作者信息

de Irala Jokin, Ruiz-Canela Miguel, Martínez-González Miguel Angel

机构信息

Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health. Faculty of Medicine, University of Navarra, Spain.

出版信息

Med Sci Monit. 2005 Dec;11(12):RA355-8. Epub 2005 Nov 24.

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to update and critically analyze the public health relevance of available evidence about the causal relationship between cannabis use and psychosis or depression. There are conflicting views about this causal relationship. Two systematic reviews of existing evidence assessed this association and were published in 2004, but they came to different conclusions. From a public health perspective a thorough discussion is warranted before attributing any observed effect to potential biases. First, the impact of residual confounding in this causal relationship is discussed. We consider that the attenuation of estimates after controlling for confounding factors cannot be interpreted as evidence to support the claim that residual confounding fully explains this link. Secondly, taking into account the results of recent studies, the time-sequence and dose-response criteria of causality are discussed. The fact that unreported or subclinical psychological problems might have preceded and precipitated cannabis use is a very unlikely explanation when the cannabis-psychosis outcome link is assessed from different longitudinal studies. And finally, available evidence is interpreted with a broad view of public health and by taking into account the precautionary principle. We therefore provide reasons to support the case that stronger preventive actions against cannabis are still required in order to avoid the potential increased incidence of psychosocial health problems in the future.

摘要

本文旨在更新并批判性地分析关于大麻使用与精神病或抑郁症之间因果关系的现有证据对公共卫生的相关性。关于这种因果关系存在相互矛盾的观点。两项对现有证据的系统评价评估了这种关联,并于2004年发表,但得出了不同的结论。从公共卫生的角度来看,在将任何观察到的影响归因于潜在偏差之前,有必要进行全面的讨论。首先,讨论了这种因果关系中残余混杂因素的影响。我们认为,在控制混杂因素后估计值的减弱不能被解释为支持残余混杂因素完全解释这种联系这一说法的证据。其次,考虑到近期研究的结果,讨论了因果关系的时间顺序和剂量反应标准。当从不同的纵向研究评估大麻与精神病的结果联系时,未报告或亚临床心理问题可能先于并促成大麻使用这一事实是一个极不可能的解释。最后,从公共卫生的广泛视角并考虑到预防原则来解释现有证据。因此,我们提供理由支持这样的观点,即仍需要采取更强有力的预防大麻措施,以避免未来社会心理健康问题的潜在发病率上升。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验