Chaobal Harshvardhan N, Kharasch Evan D
Departments of Anesthesiology and Medicinal Chemistry, University of Washington, 660 South Euclid Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63110-1093, USA.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2005 Nov;78(5):529-39. doi: 10.1016/j.clpt.2005.08.004.
The clearances of oral and intravenous alfentanil are in vivo probes for assessing first-pass and hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A activity. Clearance determinations require time-consuming and expensive serial blood samples and quantitative analysis. This investigation tested the hypothesis that a single concentration measurement can accurately predict alfentanil clearance and compared limited sampling results for alfentanil and midazolam.
Data were analyzed from 2 previous studies in healthy volunteers (n = 10 in each). By use of a dose-finding protocol, subjects received oral alfentanil (23, 30, 43, or 75 microg/kg). By use of a CYP3A modulation protocol, subjects received oral or intravenous alfentanil and midazolam after pretreatment with rifampin (INN, rifampicin) (CYP3A induction), troleandomycin (CYP3A inhibition), grapefruit juice (intestinal CYP3A inhibition), or nothing (control). Alfentanil and midazolam area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) was calculated by noncompartmental analysis. Correlations between AUC and plasma concentration at each time point were evaluated by unweighted and weighted (1/y, 1/y(2)) linear regression, and the optimal weight and sampling time were determined.
Correlations between AUC and plasma concentration were best with 1/y(2) weights. Optimal correlations were at 1.5 to 2 hours for each alfentanil dose and also in an all-dose composite analysis. With the CYP3A modulation protocol, correlations for the control, grapefruit juice, rifampin, and troleandomycin sessions were optimal at 2, 3, 1.5, and 12 hours, respectively, for oral alfentanil, at 2, 3, 0.5, and 9 hours, respectively, for intravenous alfentanil, at 5, 5, 1.5, and 13 hours, respectively, for oral midazolam, and at 3, 1.75, 1, and 13 hours, respectively, for intravenous midazolam. In a composite analysis of all treatments, correlations (oral and intravenous) were optimal at 4 to 5 hours for alfentanil and 5 to 6 hours for midazolam. AUC estimated by a single-point concentration was highly predictive of measured AUC (r(2) = 0.91 and 0.93 for oral and intravenous alfentanil, respectively, and r(2) = 0.90 and 0.87 for oral and intravenous midazolam, respectively). CYP3A induction or inhibition was detected equally well by single-point alfentanil concentrations and by formal AUC determinations.
A single plasma concentration can predict alfentanil AUC and hence clearance, independent of dose, and thus appears to be an effective and efficient strategy for assessing CYP3A modulation over a broad spectrum of enzyme activity.
口服和静脉注射阿芬太尼的清除率是用于评估首过效应和肝细胞色素P450(CYP)3A活性的体内探针。清除率的测定需要耗时且昂贵的系列血样和定量分析。本研究检验了单次浓度测量可准确预测阿芬太尼清除率这一假设,并比较了阿芬太尼和咪达唑仑的有限采样结果。
分析了之前两项针对健康志愿者的研究(每项研究n = 10)的数据。采用剂量探索方案,受试者口服阿芬太尼(23、30、43或75μg/kg)。采用CYP3A调节方案,受试者在接受利福平(国际非专利药品名称,利福平)(CYP3A诱导剂)、醋竹桃霉素(CYP3A抑制剂)、葡萄柚汁(肠道CYP3A抑制剂)预处理或不进行预处理(对照)后,口服或静脉注射阿芬太尼和咪达唑仑。通过非房室分析计算阿芬太尼和咪达唑仑的浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)。通过非加权和加权(1/y、1/y²)线性回归评估每个时间点的AUC与血浆浓度之间的相关性,并确定最佳权重和采样时间。
采用1/y²权重时,AUC与血浆浓度之间的相关性最佳。每种阿芬太尼剂量以及全剂量综合分析的最佳相关性出现在1.5至2小时。采用CYP3A调节方案时,对于口服阿芬太尼,对照、葡萄柚汁、利福平、醋竹桃霉素组的最佳相关性时间分别为2、3、1.5和12小时;对于静脉注射阿芬太尼,分别为2、3、0.5和9小时;对于口服咪达唑仑,分别为5、5、1.5和13小时;对于静脉注射咪达唑仑,分别为3、1.75、1和13小时。在所有治疗的综合分析中,阿芬太尼(口服和静脉注射)的最佳相关性时间为第4至5小时,咪达唑仑为第5至6小时。由单点浓度估计的AUC对实测AUC具有高度预测性(口服和静脉注射阿芬太尼的r²分别为0.91和0.93,口服和静脉注射咪达唑仑的r²分别为0.90和0.87)。通过单点阿芬太尼浓度和正式的AUC测定,对CYP3A诱导或抑制的检测效果相当。
单次血浆浓度可预测阿芬太尼的AUC,进而预测清除率,且与剂量无关,因此似乎是一种在广泛酶活性范围内评估CYP3A调节的有效且高效的策略。