Chung Ellen, Nafziger Anne N, Kazierad David J, Bertino Joseph S
Pfizer Global Research and Development, Groton Laboratories, Groton, USA.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Apr;79(4):350-61. doi: 10.1016/j.clpt.2005.11.016. Epub 2006 Feb 28.
Our objective was to compare simvastatin with the validated probe midazolam in the assessment of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A activity.
This study used an open-label, fixed-sequential, 3-way crossover study design. Nineteen subjects received oral doses of 0.075 mg/kg midazolam and 40 mg simvastatin during 3 phases (baseline, after inhibition with 400 mg ketoconazole for 10 days, and after induction with 600 mg rifampin [INN, rifampicin] for 9 days). Serial plasma concentrations of midazolam and simvastatin were obtained. Oral clearances of midazolam and simvastatin were compared.
Oral midazolam clearance decreased after pretreatment with ketoconazole (from a geometric mean of 25 mL x min(-1) x kg(-1) [range, 12-57 mL x min(-1) x kg(-1)] to 2.7 mL x min(-1) x kg(-1) [range, 1.2-8.5 mL x min(-1) x kg(-1)], P < .001) and increased after pretreatment with rifampin (to a geometric mean of 203 mL x min(-1) x kg(-1) [range, 125-371 mL x min(-1) x kg(-1)], P < .001). Oral simvastatin clearance decreased after ketoconazole (from a geometric mean of 312 mL x min(-1) x kg(-1) [range, 151-1478 mL x min(-1) x kg(-1)] to 25 mL x min(-1) x kg(-1) [range, 8.0-147 mL x min(-1) x kg(-1)], P < .001) and increased after rifampin (to a geometric mean of 3536 mL x min(-1) x kg(-1) [range, 413-10,329 mL x min(-1) x kg(-1)], P < .001). The change in simvastatin clearance was highly variable from baseline to inhibition (6- to 33-fold decrease) and from baseline to induction (2- to 39-fold increase) compared with midazolam (7- to 18-fold decrease during inhibition and 4- to 12-fold increase during induction). Midazolam and simvastatin oral clearances were correlated for all study phases (r = 0.5 and P = .03 for baseline and r = 0.53 and P = .02 for inhibition) but were weakest for induction (r = -0.031, P = .22). The area under the concentration-time curve inhibitory ratio for midazolam was 9.4 versus 12.4 for simvastatin (r = 0.3, P = .03).
Compared with midazolam, simvastatin is a nonvalidated, suboptimal probe for studying CYP3A drug interactions because of its lack of CYP3A specificity.
我们的目的是在评估细胞色素P450(CYP)3A活性方面,将辛伐他汀与经验证的探针咪达唑仑进行比较。
本研究采用开放标签、固定顺序、三向交叉研究设计。19名受试者在3个阶段(基线期、用400mg酮康唑抑制10天后、用600mg利福平[国际非专利药品名称,利福平]诱导9天后)接受口服剂量的0.075mg/kg咪达唑仑和40mg辛伐他汀。获取咪达唑仑和辛伐他汀的系列血浆浓度。比较咪达唑仑和辛伐他汀的口服清除率。
酮康唑预处理后,口服咪达唑仑清除率降低(从几何平均值25mL·min⁻¹·kg⁻¹[范围,12 - 57mL·min⁻¹·kg⁻¹]降至2.7mL·min⁻¹·kg⁻¹[范围,1.2 - 8.5mL·min⁻¹·kg⁻¹],P <.001),利福平预处理后升高(至几何平均值203mL·min⁻¹·kg⁻¹[范围,125 - 371mL·min⁻¹·kg⁻¹],P <.001)。酮康唑后口服辛伐他汀清除率降低(从几何平均值312mL·min⁻¹·kg⁻¹[范围,151 - 1478mL·min⁻¹·kg⁻¹]降至25mL·min⁻¹·kg⁻¹[范围,8.0 - 147mL·min⁻¹·kg⁻¹],P <.001),利福平后升高(至几何平均值3536mL·min⁻¹·kg⁻¹[范围,413 - 10329mL·min⁻¹·kg⁻¹],P <.001)。与咪达唑仑相比,从基线到抑制期(6至33倍降低)以及从基线到诱导期(2至39倍升高),辛伐他汀清除率的变化差异很大(咪达唑仑在抑制期为7至18倍降低,诱导期为4至12倍升高)。在所有研究阶段,咪达唑仑和辛伐他汀的口服清除率均相关(基线期r = 0.5,P =.03;抑制期r = 0.53,P =.02),但在诱导期相关性最弱(r = -0.031,P =.22)。咪达唑仑的浓度 - 时间曲线下面积抑制率为9.4,辛伐他汀为12.4(r = 0.3,P =.03)。
与咪达唑仑相比,辛伐他汀由于缺乏CYP3A特异性,是一种未经验证的、次优的用于研究CYP3A药物相互作用的探针。