Suppr超能文献

咪达唑仑和辛伐他汀作为细胞色素P450 3A探针的比较。

Comparison of midazolam and simvastatin as cytochrome P450 3A probes.

作者信息

Chung Ellen, Nafziger Anne N, Kazierad David J, Bertino Joseph S

机构信息

Pfizer Global Research and Development, Groton Laboratories, Groton, USA.

出版信息

Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Apr;79(4):350-61. doi: 10.1016/j.clpt.2005.11.016. Epub 2006 Feb 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to compare simvastatin with the validated probe midazolam in the assessment of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A activity.

METHODS

This study used an open-label, fixed-sequential, 3-way crossover study design. Nineteen subjects received oral doses of 0.075 mg/kg midazolam and 40 mg simvastatin during 3 phases (baseline, after inhibition with 400 mg ketoconazole for 10 days, and after induction with 600 mg rifampin [INN, rifampicin] for 9 days). Serial plasma concentrations of midazolam and simvastatin were obtained. Oral clearances of midazolam and simvastatin were compared.

RESULTS

Oral midazolam clearance decreased after pretreatment with ketoconazole (from a geometric mean of 25 mL x min(-1) x kg(-1) [range, 12-57 mL x min(-1) x kg(-1)] to 2.7 mL x min(-1) x kg(-1) [range, 1.2-8.5 mL x min(-1) x kg(-1)], P < .001) and increased after pretreatment with rifampin (to a geometric mean of 203 mL x min(-1) x kg(-1) [range, 125-371 mL x min(-1) x kg(-1)], P < .001). Oral simvastatin clearance decreased after ketoconazole (from a geometric mean of 312 mL x min(-1) x kg(-1) [range, 151-1478 mL x min(-1) x kg(-1)] to 25 mL x min(-1) x kg(-1) [range, 8.0-147 mL x min(-1) x kg(-1)], P < .001) and increased after rifampin (to a geometric mean of 3536 mL x min(-1) x kg(-1) [range, 413-10,329 mL x min(-1) x kg(-1)], P < .001). The change in simvastatin clearance was highly variable from baseline to inhibition (6- to 33-fold decrease) and from baseline to induction (2- to 39-fold increase) compared with midazolam (7- to 18-fold decrease during inhibition and 4- to 12-fold increase during induction). Midazolam and simvastatin oral clearances were correlated for all study phases (r = 0.5 and P = .03 for baseline and r = 0.53 and P = .02 for inhibition) but were weakest for induction (r = -0.031, P = .22). The area under the concentration-time curve inhibitory ratio for midazolam was 9.4 versus 12.4 for simvastatin (r = 0.3, P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with midazolam, simvastatin is a nonvalidated, suboptimal probe for studying CYP3A drug interactions because of its lack of CYP3A specificity.

摘要

目的

我们的目的是在评估细胞色素P450(CYP)3A活性方面,将辛伐他汀与经验证的探针咪达唑仑进行比较。

方法

本研究采用开放标签、固定顺序、三向交叉研究设计。19名受试者在3个阶段(基线期、用400mg酮康唑抑制10天后、用600mg利福平[国际非专利药品名称,利福平]诱导9天后)接受口服剂量的0.075mg/kg咪达唑仑和40mg辛伐他汀。获取咪达唑仑和辛伐他汀的系列血浆浓度。比较咪达唑仑和辛伐他汀的口服清除率。

结果

酮康唑预处理后,口服咪达唑仑清除率降低(从几何平均值25mL·min⁻¹·kg⁻¹[范围,12 - 57mL·min⁻¹·kg⁻¹]降至2.7mL·min⁻¹·kg⁻¹[范围,1.2 - 8.5mL·min⁻¹·kg⁻¹],P <.001),利福平预处理后升高(至几何平均值203mL·min⁻¹·kg⁻¹[范围,125 - 371mL·min⁻¹·kg⁻¹],P <.001)。酮康唑后口服辛伐他汀清除率降低(从几何平均值312mL·min⁻¹·kg⁻¹[范围,151 - 1478mL·min⁻¹·kg⁻¹]降至25mL·min⁻¹·kg⁻¹[范围,8.0 - 147mL·min⁻¹·kg⁻¹],P <.001),利福平后升高(至几何平均值3536mL·min⁻¹·kg⁻¹[范围,413 - 10329mL·min⁻¹·kg⁻¹],P <.001)。与咪达唑仑相比,从基线到抑制期(6至33倍降低)以及从基线到诱导期(2至39倍升高),辛伐他汀清除率的变化差异很大(咪达唑仑在抑制期为7至18倍降低,诱导期为4至12倍升高)。在所有研究阶段,咪达唑仑和辛伐他汀的口服清除率均相关(基线期r = 0.5,P =.03;抑制期r = 0.53,P =.02),但在诱导期相关性最弱(r = -0.031,P =.22)。咪达唑仑的浓度 - 时间曲线下面积抑制率为9.4,辛伐他汀为12.4(r = 0.3,P =.03)。

结论

与咪达唑仑相比,辛伐他汀由于缺乏CYP3A特异性,是一种未经验证的、次优的用于研究CYP3A药物相互作用的探针。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验