Suppr超能文献

新的治疗方法(自体移植、沙利度胺、地塞米松)能否提高在风湿科接受治疗的多发性骨髓瘤患者的生存率?

Do new therapeutic approaches (autotransplants, thalidomide, dexamethasone) improve the survival of patients with multiple myeloma followed in a rheumatology department?

作者信息

El Mahou S, Attal M, Jamard B, Constantin A, Cantagrel A, Mazières B, Arnaud C, Laroche M

机构信息

Rheumatology Department, Rangueil University Hospital, CHU Rangueil, 1 avenue Jean Poulhes, 31059 Toulouse Cedex 9, France.

出版信息

Clin Rheumatol. 2006 Mar;25(2):175-82. doi: 10.1007/s10067-005-1151-4. Epub 2005 Nov 23.

Abstract

Survival of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) showed no improvement between the 1960s and 1990s. During the last decade, new therapeutic approaches seemed likely to offer hope of prolonging survival. The aim of this study was to examine if this survival increased with the usage of new treatments. The method involves a retrospective study of 123 patients with MM, diagnosed between 1975 and 1999, all receiving treatment. They were divided into two groups: group 1 included 55 patients given the so-called "old treatments" [melphalan-prednisone, cyclophosphamide-prednisone, polychemotherapy (vincristine, melphalan, cyclophosphamide, prednisone (VMCP), VMCP-VBAP)], and group 2 included 68 patients receiving at least one of the so-called "new treatments" (dexamethasone, thalidomide, high-dose chemotherapy followed by autotransplants, bisphosphonates, interferon). The two groups were similar in terms of age, sex ratio and renal impairment, and the percentage of light-chain MM was identical in both groups. Patients who had been given a "new" treatment (group 2) had longer median survival than the patients in group 1 (54 vs 42 months). Independent analysis of each treatment modality showed increased median survival in MM patients treated using autotransplantation compared with untreated patients (125 vs 45 months). Survival was also longer in MM patients treated with thalidomide than in untreated patients (72 vs 42 months). On the other hand, neither bisphosphonates, interferon-alpha nor dexamethasone result in improved survival. Our findings emphasize the increased survival of the MM patients treated with new therapeutic approaches.

摘要

20世纪60年代至90年代期间,多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者的生存率没有改善。在过去十年中,新的治疗方法似乎有望延长生存期。本研究的目的是检验这种生存率是否随着新治疗方法的使用而提高。该方法涉及对1975年至1999年间诊断的123例均接受治疗的MM患者进行回顾性研究。他们被分为两组:第1组包括55例接受所谓“旧治疗”[美法仑-泼尼松、环磷酰胺-泼尼松、联合化疗(长春新碱、美法仑、环磷酰胺、泼尼松(VMCP)、VMCP-VBAP)]的患者,第2组包括68例接受至少一种所谓“新治疗”(地塞米松、沙利度胺、大剂量化疗后自体移植、双膦酸盐、干扰素)的患者。两组在年龄、性别比和肾功能损害方面相似,两组轻链MM的百分比相同。接受“新”治疗的患者(第2组)的中位生存期比第1组患者长(54个月对42个月)。对每种治疗方式的独立分析显示,与未治疗的患者相比,接受自体移植治疗的MM患者的中位生存期增加(125个月对45个月)。接受沙利度胺治疗的MM患者的生存期也比未治疗的患者长(72个月对42个月)。另一方面,双膦酸盐、α干扰素和地塞米松均未改善生存期。我们的研究结果强调了采用新治疗方法治疗的MM患者生存率的提高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验