Moreau Philippe, Facon Thierry, Attal Michel, Hulin Cyrille, Michallet Mauricette, Maloisel Frédéric, Sotto Jean-Jacques, Guilhot François, Marit Gérald, Doyen Chantal, Jaubert Jérôme, Fuzibet Jean-Gabriel, François Sylvie, Benboubker Lotfi, Monconduit Matthieu, Voillat Laurent, Macro Margaret, Berthou Christian, Dorvaux Véronique, Pignon Bernard, Rio Bernard, Matthes Thomas, Casassus Philippe, Caillot Denis, Najman Norbert, Grosbois Bernard, Bataille Régis, Harousseau Jean-Luc
Service d'Hématologie, University Hospital Hôtel-Dieu, Place Alexis Recordeau, 44093 Nantes cedex 01, France.
Blood. 2002 Feb 1;99(3):731-5. doi: 10.1182/blood.v99.3.731.
High-dose therapy has become a common treatment for myeloma. The objective of this study (Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome [IFM] 9502 trial) was to compare in a prospective and randomized trial the 2 most widely used conditioning regimens before autologous stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed symptomatic patients younger than 65 years old: 8 Gy total body irradiation plus 140 mg/m(2) melphalan (arm A) versus 200 mg/m(2) melphalan (arm B). A total of 282 evaluable patients were compared--140 in arm A and 142 in arm B. Baseline characteristics and disease response to 4 cycles of the VAD regimen performed before randomization and autologous stem cell transplantation were identical in the 2 treatment arms. In arm B, hematologic recovery was significantly faster for both the duration of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, transfusion requirements were also significantly lower, and the median duration of hospitalization was significantly shorter. In arm A, the incidence of severe mucositis was significantly increased. The median duration of event-free survival was similar in both arms (21 vs 20.5 months, P =.6), but the 45-month survival was 65.8% in arm B versus 45.5% in arm A (P =.05). This difference might be attributed in part to better salvage regimens after relapse in arm B compared with arm A. We conclude that 200 mg/m(2) melphalan is a less toxic and at least as effective conditioning regimen when compared with 8 Gy total body irradiation with 140 mg/m(2) melphalan. This regimen should be considered as the standard of care before autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma.
大剂量疗法已成为骨髓瘤的常见治疗方法。本研究(法语国家骨髓瘤研究组[IFM]9502试验)的目的是在一项前瞻性随机试验中,比较65岁以下新诊断的有症状患者在自体干细胞移植前两种最广泛使用的预处理方案:全身照射8 Gy加马法兰140 mg/m²(A组)与马法兰200 mg/m²(B组)。共比较了282例可评估患者,A组140例,B组142例。在随机分组和自体干细胞移植前进行的4个周期VAD方案治疗中,两组的基线特征和疾病反应相同。在B组,中性粒细胞减少和血小板减少的持续时间方面,血液学恢复明显更快,输血需求也显著更低,住院中位时间明显更短。在A组,严重黏膜炎的发生率显著增加。两组的无事件生存期中位时间相似(21个月对20.5个月,P = 0.6),但45个月生存率B组为65.8%,A组为45.5%(P = 0.05)。这种差异可能部分归因于B组与A组相比复发后有更好的挽救方案。我们得出结论,与全身照射8 Gy加马法兰140 mg/m²相比,马法兰200 mg/m²是一种毒性较小且至少同样有效的预处理方案。该方案应被视为多发性骨髓瘤自体干细胞移植前的标准治疗方案。