Vitale G C, Zavaleta C M, Vitale D S, Binford J C, Tran T C, Larson G M
Department of Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY 40292, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2006 Jan;20(1):149-52. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0308-1. Epub 2005 Dec 7.
General surgeons commonly perform upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in practice, but few perform endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), partly because of limited training opportunities. This report focuses on the value of an ERCP fellowship training program to a broad-based, mature residency in surgery and our observations on the experience required for surgeons to be trained in advanced interventional ERCP.
Since the program was initiated in 1992, 13 ERCP fellows have been trained for individual periods of 6 to 14 months. This study investigated all procedures with fellow involvement (2,008 cases) from among a total experience of 3,641 ERCPs. Data collected included type of ERCP (diagnostic/therapeutic), fellow success in cannulating the duct of interest, and faculty success in cases of fellows who failed. Of the 13 fellows, 9 had previous endoscopy experience, but none had training in ERCP.
An 85% cannulation rate was accepted as successful, and cannulation rates for each fellow were calculated for each 3-month period. The 85% mark was reached by 4 (31%) of 13 fellows in the first period, 2 of 13 fellows (15%) in the second period, 5 of 11 fellows (45%) in the third period, 7 of 10 fellows (70%) in the fourth period, and 1 of 1 fellow (100%) in the fifth period of training. On the average, it took 7.1 months and 102 ERCPs for trainees to reach desired success levels. Success came more promptly with prior exposure to endoscopy. Fellows without prior endoscopic experience required 148 cases to reach 85% success. Resident surgical experience with major pancreatic resections increased threefold after establishment of the fellowship.
Training in ERCP is possible within the scope of a surgical fellowship in a reasonable length of time and experience. Complication rates remain low even with fellow involvement. Establishment of an ERCP program increases the focus and experience of pancreas surgery in a surgical residency for chief residents.
普通外科医生在实际工作中常进行上消化道内镜检查,但很少有人进行内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP),部分原因是培训机会有限。本报告重点关注ERCP专科培训项目对广泛、成熟的外科住院医师培训的价值,以及我们对外科医生接受高级介入性ERCP培训所需经验的观察。
自1992年该项目启动以来,13名ERCP专科住院医师接受了为期6至14个月的培训。本研究调查了在3641例ERCP总经验中,有专科住院医师参与的所有操作(2008例)。收集的数据包括ERCP的类型(诊断性/治疗性)、专科住院医师成功插入目标胆管的情况,以及专科住院医师操作失败时带教老师的成功情况。13名专科住院医师中,9人有内镜检查经验,但均未接受过ERCP培训。
插管成功率以85%为成功标准,并计算每名专科住院医师每3个月的插管率。13名专科住院医师中,4人(31%)在第一阶段达到85%的标准,第二阶段13名专科住院医师中有2人(15%),第三阶段11名专科住院医师中有5人(45%),第四阶段10名专科住院医师中有7人(70%),第五阶段1名专科住院医师中有1人(100%)达到该标准。平均而言,学员达到理想成功水平需要7.1个月和102例ERCP操作。有内镜检查经验的学员成功来得更快。没有内镜检查经验的专科住院医师需要148例操作才能达到85%的成功率。专科培训项目建立后,住院医师在胰腺大手术方面的经验增加了两倍。
在合理的时间和经验范围内,外科专科培训中可以进行ERCP培训。即使有专科住院医师参与,并发症发生率仍然很低。ERCP项目的建立增加了外科住院医师培训中胰腺手术的重点和经验。