• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对中国样本中的社会背景和权力运用进行的实验性考察。

An experimental examination of social contexts and the use of power in a Chinese sample.

作者信息

Tjosvold Dean, Sun Haifa F, Wan Paulina

机构信息

Department of Management, Lingnan University, Tuen Mun, Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

J Soc Psychol. 2005 Dec;145(6):645-61. doi: 10.3200/SOCP.145.6.645-662.

DOI:10.3200/SOCP.145.6.645-662
PMID:16334512
Abstract

Researchers have considered power as a largely corrupting force in organizations. In the present experiment, the authors used the theory of cooperation and competition to investigate the effects of social context on power use in a sample of Chinese participants. The present results support the reasoning that high power compared to low power provides the capacity to assist employees and that cooperative, but not competitive, goals facilitate the motivation of managers to use their power to support employees and to develop managerial conclusions that employees are capable and appreciative. These results suggest limitations to traditional organizational power theories that assume a competitive context between the powerful and those subject to power. Cooperative goals appear to be an important basis for developing the positive face of power in organizations in China and perhaps in other cultures as well.

摘要

研究人员认为权力在组织中很大程度上是一种腐败力量。在本实验中,作者运用合作与竞争理论,对一组中国参与者进行抽样,以研究社会环境对权力运用的影响。目前的结果支持了这样的推断:与低权力相比,高权力赋予了协助员工的能力,并且合作而非竞争的目标会促进管理者运用权力支持员工的积极性,以及得出员工有能力且心怀感激的管理结论。这些结果表明,传统组织权力理论存在局限性,这些理论假定权力者与受权力影响者之间存在竞争环境。合作目标似乎是在中国乃至其他文化背景下,塑造组织中权力正面形象的重要基础。

相似文献

1
An experimental examination of social contexts and the use of power in a Chinese sample.对中国样本中的社会背景和权力运用进行的实验性考察。
J Soc Psychol. 2005 Dec;145(6):645-61. doi: 10.3200/SOCP.145.6.645-662.
2
Antecedents of team potency and team effectiveness: an examination of goal and process clarity and servant leadership.团队效力和团队效能的前因:对目标和过程清晰度及仆人式领导的检验。
J Appl Psychol. 2011 Jul;96(4):851-62. doi: 10.1037/a0022465.
3
Management's role in shaping organizational culture.管理层在塑造组织文化中的作用。
J Nurs Manag. 2006 Apr;14(3):188-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2934.2006.00590.x.
4
Status Decreases Dominance in the West but Increases Dominance in the East.地位在西方下降,但在东方上升。
Psychol Sci. 2016 Feb;27(2):127-37. doi: 10.1177/0956797615612694. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
5
Employee customer orientation in manufacturing organizations: joint influences of customer proximity and the senior leadership team.制造型组织中的员工顾客导向:顾客接近度与高级领导团队的共同影响
J Appl Psychol. 2008 Mar;93(2):317-28. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.317.
6
Words that hurt: Leaders' anti-Asian communication and employee outcomes.伤人之词:领导者的反亚裔言论与员工结果
J Appl Psychol. 2021 Feb;106(2):169-184. doi: 10.1037/apl0000873.
7
8
Heroes or Villains? The Dark Side of Charismatic Leadership and Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior.英雄还是恶棍?魅力型领导和不道德的亲组织行为的阴暗面。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 31;17(15):5546. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155546.
9
How to invest in social capital.如何投资社会资本。
Harv Bus Rev. 2001 Jun;79(6):86-93, 147.
10
Cognition in organizations.组织中的认知
Annu Rev Psychol. 2008;59:387-417. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093612.