Suppr超能文献

咪达唑仑用于接受上消化道内镜检查的患者:一项前瞻性、单盲随机研究,以确定内镜检查的合适剂量和开始时间。

Midazolam for patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a prospective, single-blind and randomized study to determine the appropriate amount and time of initiation of endoscopy.

作者信息

Yi Sun Young, Shin Jeong Eun

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Research Center, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005 Dec;20(12):1873-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2004.04081.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Midazolam is currently the most used sedative agent in endoscopy. The present study was designed to examine the appropriate dose of midazolam, time of initiation of endoscopy after midazolam infusion, and to prove the necessity of flumazenil as an antidote.

METHODS

One hundred and eighty patients undergoing diagnostic gastroscopy were assigned three different amounts of intravenous midazolam in prospective, single-blinded and randomized setting as follows: (i) group I 0.03 mg/kg midazolam; (ii) group II 0.06 mg/kg midazolam; and (iii) group III 0.09 mg/kg midazolam. Endoscopy was initiated 30, 60 and 90 s after infusion of midazolam within each group. After endoscopy, patients were divided into two groups, one receiving flumazenil and one placebo in a double-blind fashion. The ease of the procedure, the conscious sedative state, the paradoxical response, the level of satisfaction and anterograde amnesia were assessed using a 100 mm visual analog scale.

RESULTS

The endoscopist's assessments were not changed by the different doses of midazolam; however, significant differences were observed in the paradoxical responses (P < 0.05). The level of satisfaction with endoscopy was notably different between group I and the other two groups (P < 0.05). Amnesia was boosted according with increasing doses of midazolam (P < 0.05). The time until discharge after endoscopy was significantly different between group III and the other two groups (P < 0.05) and the discharge time was reduced in the flumazenil subgroup compared with the placebo subgroup in group III (P < 0.05). Group II (0.06 mg/kg) reported good levels of satisfaction, fewer paradoxical responses and short discharge time without any side-effects. Comparing the time of initiation of endoscopy (at 30, 60 and 90 s after midazolam) in each group, there were no significant differences in the level of satisfaction, conscious sedative state and amnesia.

CONCLUSIONS

Midazolam should be administered at a dose of 0.06 mg/kg and the endoscopy should be initiated 30 s after midazolam injection for appropriate effects without any side-effects. Flumazenil is not necessary, except in the case of the use of a high dose (above 0.09 mg/kg) of midazolam.

摘要

背景与目的

咪达唑仑是目前内镜检查中最常用的镇静剂。本研究旨在探讨咪达唑仑的合适剂量、咪达唑仑输注后开始内镜检查的时间,并证明氟马西尼作为解毒剂的必要性。

方法

180例接受诊断性胃镜检查的患者被前瞻性、单盲且随机地分为三组,分别给予不同剂量的静脉注射咪达唑仑:(i)第一组,0.03mg/kg咪达唑仑;(ii)第二组,0.06mg/kg咪达唑仑;(iii)第三组,0.09mg/kg咪达唑仑。每组在咪达唑仑输注后30、60和90秒开始内镜检查。内镜检查后,患者被分为两组,一组接受氟马西尼,另一组接受安慰剂,采用双盲方式。使用100mm视觉模拟量表评估操作的难易程度、清醒镇静状态、反常反应、满意度和顺行性遗忘。

结果

不同剂量的咪达唑仑并未改变内镜医师的评估;然而,在反常反应方面观察到显著差异(P<0.05)。第一组与其他两组在内镜检查的满意度上存在显著差异(P<0.05)。随着咪达唑仑剂量的增加,遗忘效果增强(P<0.05)。第三组与其他两组在内镜检查后至出院的时间上存在显著差异(P<0.05),并且在第三组中,氟马西尼亚组的出院时间比安慰剂亚组缩短(P<0.05)。第二组(0.06mg/kg)报告了良好的满意度、较少的反常反应和较短的出院时间,且无任何副作用。比较每组内镜检查开始的时间(咪达唑仑后30、60和90秒),在满意度、清醒镇静状态和遗忘方面无显著差异。

结论

咪达唑仑应以0.06mg/kg的剂量给药,并且应在咪达唑仑注射后30秒开始内镜检查,以获得适当效果且无任何副作用。除使用高剂量(高于0.09mg/kg)咪达唑仑的情况外,氟马西尼并非必需。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验