Spinou Marianna, Kyvelou Eleni, Aggelopoulos Giorgos, Ziogas Dimitrios Ι, Panagaki Antonia, Manti Magdalini, Papaefthymiou Apostolis, Gkolfakis Paraskevas, Facciorusso Antonio, Mathou Nikoletta, Giannakopoulos Athanasios, Triantafyllou Konstantinos, Paraskeva Konstantina D, Vezakis Antonios, Vlachogiannakos Ioannis, Karamanolis George, Tziatzios Georgios
Department of Gastroenterology, "Konstantopoulio-Patision" General Hospital of Nea Ionia, Athens, Greece (Marianna Spinou, Eleni Kyvelou, Giorgos Aggelopoulos, Antonia Panagaki, Magdalini Manti, Paraskevas Gkolfakis, Nikoletta Mathou, Athanasios Giannakopoulos, Konstantina D. Paraskeva, Georgios Tziatzios).
1 Department of Internal Medicine, 251 Hellenic Air Force & VA General Hospital, Athens, Greece (Dimitrios Ι. Ziogas).
Ann Gastroenterol. 2024 Sep-Oct;37(5):499-508. doi: 10.20524/aog.2024.0899. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
Sedation and analgesia during gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy increase procedural quality, contributing at the same time to greater patient satisfaction and willingness to undergo the procedure. Although sedation use has been optimized by the advent of efficacious and safe medications, data regarding the minimal criteria for discharge after outpatient endoscopy remain scant. Moreover, the time of discharge after endoscopy can be highly variable, depending not only on the type of procedure and anesthesia administered, but also on postprocedural complications and the patient's comorbidities. To make things even more conflicting, there is neither consensus among various endoscopic societies, concerning the most appropriate discharge strategy, nor a universally established tool that could be incorporated into everyday clinical practice, allowing patients' safe discharge as well as ability to drive. In this context, we conducted a systematic review, aiming to summarize the evidence regarding the available discharge scoring systems after outpatient GI endoscopy with sedation and analgesia administration.
胃肠(GI)内镜检查期间的镇静和镇痛可提高操作质量,同时提高患者满意度和接受该操作的意愿。尽管有效且安全的药物问世后镇静药物的使用已得到优化,但关于门诊内镜检查后出院的最低标准的数据仍然很少。此外,内镜检查后的出院时间差异很大,这不仅取决于操作类型和所给予的麻醉,还取决于术后并发症和患者的合并症。更矛盾的是,各种内镜学会对于最合适的出院策略尚未达成共识,也没有一个普遍适用的工具可纳入日常临床实践,以确保患者安全出院以及具备驾驶能力。在此背景下,我们进行了一项系统综述,旨在总结有关门诊胃肠内镜检查并给予镇静和镇痛后可用出院评分系统的证据。