Cohen J C, Gyansa-Lutterodt M, Torpey K, Esmail L C, Kurokawa G
Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto.
Global Health. 2005 Dec 9;1:17. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-1-17.
There are acute disparities in pharmaceutical access between developing and industrialized countries. Developing countries make up approximately 80% of the world's population but only represent approximately 20% of global pharmaceutical consumption. Among the many barriers to drug access are the potential consequences of the Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Agreement. Many developing countries have recently modified their patent laws to conform to the TRIPS standards, given the 2005 deadline for developing countries. Safeguards to protect public health have been incorporated into the TRIPS Agreement; however, in practice governments may be reluctant to exercise such rights given concern about the international trade and political ramifications. The Doha Declaration and the recent Decision on the Implementation of Paragraph 6 of the Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health may provide more freedom for developing countries in using these safeguards. This paper focuses on Ghana, a developing country that recently changed its patent laws to conform to TRIPS standards. We examine Ghana's patent law changes in the context of the Doha Declaration and assess their meaning for access to drugs of its population. We discuss new and existing barriers, as well as possible solutions, to provide policy-makers with lessons learned from the Ghanaian experience.
发展中国家与工业化国家在药品可及性方面存在严重差距。发展中国家约占世界人口的80%,但仅占全球药品消费量的约20%。与贸易有关的知识产权协定(TRIPS协定)的潜在影响是药品可及性面临的众多障碍之一。鉴于给发展中国家设定的2005年最后期限,许多发展中国家最近修改了其专利法以符合TRIPS标准。保护公众健康的保障措施已纳入TRIPS协定;然而,实际上,各国政府可能因担心国际贸易和政治影响而不愿行使此类权利。《多哈宣言》以及最近关于执行《多哈宣言》第6段(关于TRIPS协定与公共健康)的决定可能为发展中国家使用这些保障措施提供更多自由。本文重点关注加纳,这是一个最近修改其专利法以符合TRIPS标准的发展中国家。我们在《多哈宣言》的背景下审视加纳的专利法变化,并评估这些变化对其民众获取药品的意义。我们讨论新的和现有的障碍以及可能的解决办法,以便为政策制定者提供从加纳经验中吸取的教训。