Dudgeon David, Arthington Angela H, Gessner Mark O, Kawabata Zen-Ichiro, Knowler Duncan J, Lévêque Christian, Naiman Robert J, Prieur-Richard Anne-Hélène, Soto Doris, Stiassny Melanie L J, Sullivan Caroline A
Department of Ecology & Biodiversity, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2006 May;81(2):163-82. doi: 10.1017/S1464793105006950. Epub 2005 Dec 12.
Freshwater biodiversity is the over-riding conservation priority during the International Decade for Action - 'Water for Life' - 2005 to 2015. Fresh water makes up only 0.01% of the World's water and approximately 0.8% of the Earth's surface, yet this tiny fraction of global water supports at least 100000 species out of approximately 1.8 million - almost 6% of all described species. Inland waters and freshwater biodiversity constitute a valuable natural resource, in economic, cultural, aesthetic, scientific and educational terms. Their conservation and management are critical to the interests of all humans, nations and governments. Yet this precious heritage is in crisis. Fresh waters are experiencing declines in biodiversity far greater than those in the most affected terrestrial ecosystems, and if trends in human demands for water remain unaltered and species losses continue at current rates, the opportunity to conserve much of the remaining biodiversity in fresh water will vanish before the 'Water for Life' decade ends in 2015. Why is this so, and what is being done about it? This article explores the special features of freshwater habitats and the biodiversity they support that makes them especially vulnerable to human activities. We document threats to global freshwater biodiversity under five headings: overexploitation; water pollution; flow modification; destruction or degradation of habitat; and invasion by exotic species. Their combined and interacting influences have resulted in population declines and range reduction of freshwater biodiversity worldwide. Conservation of biodiversity is complicated by the landscape position of rivers and wetlands as 'receivers' of land-use effluents, and the problems posed by endemism and thus non-substitutability. In addition, in many parts of the world, fresh water is subject to severe competition among multiple human stakeholders. Protection of freshwater biodiversity is perhaps the ultimate conservation challenge because it is influenced by the upstream drainage network, the surrounding land, the riparian zone, and - in the case of migrating aquatic fauna - downstream reaches. Such prerequisites are hardly ever met. Immediate action is needed where opportunities exist to set aside intact lake and river ecosystems within large protected areas. For most of the global land surface, trade-offs between conservation of freshwater biodiversity and human use of ecosystem goods and services are necessary. We advocate continuing attempts to check species loss but, in many situations, urge adoption of a compromise position of management for biodiversity conservation, ecosystem functioning and resilience, and human livelihoods in order to provide a viable long-term basis for freshwater conservation. Recognition of this need will require adoption of a new paradigm for biodiversity protection and freshwater ecosystem management - one that has been appropriately termed 'reconciliation ecology'.
在2005年至2015年“生命之水”国际行动十年期间,淡水生物多样性是最重要的保护重点。淡水仅占全球水资源的0.01%,约占地球表面的0.8%,然而,这一小部分全球水资源却支撑着约180万种物种中的至少10万种——几乎占所有已知物种的6%。内陆水域和淡水生物多样性在经济、文化、美学、科学和教育方面构成了宝贵的自然资源。它们的保护和管理对所有人类、国家和政府的利益至关重要。然而,这一珍贵遗产正处于危机之中。淡水生物多样性的下降幅度远远大于受影响最严重的陆地生态系统,而且如果人类对水的需求趋势保持不变,物种损失继续以目前的速度进行,那么在2015年“生命之水”十年结束之前,保护淡水生物多样性的机会将消失。为什么会这样,正在采取什么措施?本文探讨了淡水栖息地及其所支持的生物多样性的特殊特征,这些特征使它们特别容易受到人类活动的影响。我们从五个方面记录了对全球淡水生物多样性的威胁:过度开发;水污染;水流改变;栖息地破坏或退化;外来物种入侵。它们综合和相互作用的影响导致了全球淡水生物多样性的种群数量下降和分布范围缩小。生物多样性的保护因河流和湿地作为土地利用废水“接收者”的景观位置以及特有性带来的问题(从而不可替代性)而变得复杂。此外,在世界许多地区,淡水受到多个人类利益相关者之间的激烈竞争。保护淡水生物多样性可能是最终的保护挑战,因为它受到上游排水网络、周边土地、河岸带的影响,而且对于洄游水生动物来说,还受到下游区域的影响。这样的前提条件几乎从未得到满足。在有机会在大型保护区内划出完整的湖泊和河流生态系统的地方,需要立即采取行动。对于全球大部分陆地表面来说,在保护淡水生物多样性与人类对生态系统产品和服务的利用之间进行权衡是必要的。我们主张继续努力遏制物种损失,但在许多情况下,敦促采取一种折中的立场,即在保护生物多样性、生态系统功能和恢复力以及人类生计之间进行管理,以便为淡水保护提供一个可行的长期基础。认识到这一需求将需要采用一种新的生物多样性保护和淡水生态系统管理范式——一种被恰当地称为“和解生态学”的范式。