• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术——德国腹腔镜工作组的经验

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy--the experience of the German Laparoscopic Working Group.

作者信息

Rassweiler Jens, Stolzenburg Jens, Sulser Tullio, Deger Serdar, Zumbé Jürgen, Hofmockel Georg, John Hubert, Janetschek Günther, Fehr Jean-Luc, Hatzinger Martin, Probst Michael, Rothenberger Karl-Heinz, Poulakis Vassilis, Truss Michael, Popken Gralf, Westphal Jens, Alles Uwe, Fornara Paolo

机构信息

Department of Urology, SLK Kliniken Heilbronn, University of Heidelberg, Am Gesundbrunnen 20, D-77074 Heilbronn, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Urol. 2006 Jan;49(1):113-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.10.003. Epub 2005 Nov 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2005.10.003
PMID:16337330
Abstract

PURPOSE

To present the current status of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) in Germany, Austria and Switzerland with respect to transferability, learning curve, and outcome.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The data of 5824 patients who underwent LRP in 18 centers by 50 urologists from March 1999 to August 2004 were analyzed retrospectively. Three centers performed more than 500, and six more than 250 cases. A transperitoneal descending technique with was used in 2701, a transperitoneal ascending in 1234, an extraperitoneal descending in 1814, and an extraperitoneal ascending modification in 75 cases. Specimen showed pT2 in 3535, pT3a in 1555, pT3b in 623, and pT4 in 111 cases.

RESULTS

Mean operating time averaged 211 (131-292) minutes, with shorter duration of the extraperitoneal descending technique. Conversion to open surgery averaged 2.4 (0-14.1) %. Re-intervention rate amounted to 2.7 (0.3-7.7) %. Complication rate averaged 8.9 (1.8-10.8) % including bleeding (0.3-2.5%) and rectal lesion (1.5-2.5%). The rate of positive margins was 10.6 (3.2-18) % for pT2- and 32.7 (20-38.5) % for pT3a-tumors Continence after 12 months was 84.9 (72-94) %. Data about potency (7 centers) revealed 52.5 (35-67) % full erections following bilateral nerve preservation. 5 year-PSA recurrence rate (3 centers) was 8.6 (4-15.3) % for pT2-tumors and 17.5 (15-20.6) % for pT3a-stages.

CONCLUSIONS

The results confirm the efficacy of the training program with safe transfer of LRP (i.e. low complication rate), however including all known problems of a retrospective study.

摘要

目的

介绍德国、奥地利和瑞士腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术(LRP)在可转移性、学习曲线和手术结果方面的现状。

材料与方法

回顾性分析了1999年3月至2004年8月间50位泌尿外科医生在18个中心为5824例患者实施LRP的数据。3个中心手术例数超过500例,另有6个中心超过250例。采用经腹膜下行技术的有2701例,经腹膜上行技术的有1234例,腹膜外下行技术的有1814例,腹膜外上行改良技术的有75例。标本显示pT2期3535例,pT3a期1555例,pT3b期623例,pT4期111例。

结果

平均手术时间为211(131 - 292)分钟,腹膜外下行技术的手术时间较短。转为开放手术的平均比例为2.4(0 - 14.1)%。再次干预率为2.7(0.3 - 7.7)%。并发症发生率平均为8.9(1.8 - 10.8)%,包括出血(0.3 - 2.5%)和直肠损伤(1.5 - 2.5%)。pT2期肿瘤切缘阳性率为10.6(3.2 - 18)%,pT3a期肿瘤为32.7(20 - 38.5)%。12个月后的控尿率为84.9(72 - 94)%。关于性功能(7个中心)的数据显示,双侧神经保留后完全勃起的比例为52.5(35 - 67)%。pT2期肿瘤的5年PSA复发率(3个中心)为8.6(4 - 15.3)%,pT3a期为17.5(15 - 20.6)%。

结论

结果证实了培训计划的有效性,LRP可安全转移(即并发症发生率低),不过包含了回顾性研究的所有已知问题。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy--the experience of the German Laparoscopic Working Group.腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术——德国腹腔镜工作组的经验
Eur Urol. 2006 Jan;49(1):113-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.10.003. Epub 2005 Nov 2.
2
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Heilbronn technique: an analysis of the first 180 cases.采用海尔布隆技术的腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术:对前180例病例的分析。
J Urol. 2001 Dec;166(6):2101-8.
3
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy - results of 200 consecutive cases in a Canadian medical institution.腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术——加拿大一家医疗机构200例连续病例的结果
Can J Urol. 2004 Apr;11(2):2172-85.
4
Comparison of transperitoneal and extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using match-pair analysis.采用配对分析比较经腹和腹膜外腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术
Eur Urol. 2004 Sep;46(3):312-9; discussion 320. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.05.004.
5
Complications, urinary continence, and oncologic outcome of 1000 laparoscopic transperitoneal radical prostatectomies-experience at the Charité Hospital Berlin, Campus Mitte.1000例腹腔镜经腹根治性前列腺切除术的并发症、尿失禁及肿瘤学结局——柏林夏里特医院米特区经验
Eur Urol. 2006 Dec;50(6):1278-82; discussion 1283-4. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.06.023. Epub 2006 Jul 5.
6
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Heilbronn technique: oncological results in the first 500 patients.采用海尔布隆技术的腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术:前500例患者的肿瘤学结果。
J Urol. 2005 Mar;173(3):761-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000153486.94741.e5.
7
Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: initial experience after 70 procedures.内镜下腹膜外根治性前列腺切除术:70例手术后的初步经验
J Urol. 2003 Jun;169(6):2066-71. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000067220.84015.8e.
8
The addition of robotic surgery to an established laparoscopic radical prostatectomy program: effect on positive surgical margins.在已有的腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术项目中增加机器人手术:对手术切缘阳性的影响。
Can J Urol. 2008 Apr;15(2):3994-9.
9
The effect of previous transperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy on transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.既往经腹腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术对经腹腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术的影响。
J Urol. 2005 Mar;173(3):769-72. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000152649.49630.06.
10
[Improve recovery of urinary continence following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a clinical report of 51 cases].[提高腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后尿失禁的恢复率:51例临床报告]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2008 Dec 15;46(24):1882-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating robotic assistance on the learning curve and efficiency of mandibular angle ostectomy: an animal model study.评估机器人辅助在下颌角截骨术学习曲线及效率方面的作用:一项动物模型研究。
Front Surg. 2024 Oct 16;11:1453135. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1453135. eCollection 2024.
2
Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: outcomes reported by a centre with no previous laparoscopic experience.机器人辅助腹腔镜肾盂成形术:由一个此前无腹腔镜手术经验的中心报告的结果
J Robot Surg. 2009 Jun;3(2):83-7. doi: 10.1007/s11701-009-0145-7. Epub 2009 May 29.
3
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial 15 cases in Japan.
机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术:日本的最初15例病例
J Robot Surg. 2008 Jul;2(2):85-8. doi: 10.1007/s11701-008-0087-5. Epub 2008 May 22.
4
Comparison of antegrade and retrograde laparoscopic radical prostatectomy techniques.顺行与逆行腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术技术的比较。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2016 Aug;32(8):403-6. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2016.07.003. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
5
Urethtral approach in retroperitoneoscopic radical prostatectomy: a novel technique for safe prostate dissection.后腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术中的尿道入路:一种安全前列腺解剖的新技术。
Curr Urol. 2013 Nov;7(2):98-103. doi: 10.1159/000356256. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
6
Radical perineal prostatectomy - the contemporary resurgence of a genuinely minimally invasive procedure: Procedure outline. Comparison of the advantages, disadvantages, and outcomes of different surgical techniques of treating organ-confined prostate cancer (PCa). A literature review with special focus on perineal prostatectomy.根治性会阴前列腺切除术——一种真正微创术式的当代复兴:手术概述。比较治疗局限性前列腺癌(PCa)的不同手术技术的优缺点及结果。一项特别关注会阴前列腺切除术的文献综述。
Cent European J Urol. 2012;65(4):188-94. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2012.04.art2. Epub 2012 Sep 4.
7
Analysis of the pentafecta learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的五连胜学习曲线分析
World J Urol. 2014 Oct;32(5):1225-33. doi: 10.1007/s00345-013-1198-9. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
8
Achieving proficiency with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Laparoscopic-trained versus robotics-trained surgeons.掌握机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:腹腔镜手术培训的外科医生与机器人手术培训的外科医生对比
Can Urol Assoc J. 2013 Nov-Dec;7(11-12):E711-5. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.360.
9
Complications of urologic laparoscopic surgery: a center surgeon's experience involving 601 procedures including the learning curve.泌尿外科腹腔镜手术的并发症:中心外科医生的 601 例手术经验,包括学习曲线。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2013 May;29(5):275-9. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2012.09.007. Epub 2012 Dec 21.
10
Long-term oncological and functional results of extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: one surgical team's experience on 1,600 consecutive cases.经腹腔腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的长期肿瘤学和功能学结果:一个外科团队在 1600 例连续病例中的经验。
World J Urol. 2013 Jun;31(3):529-34. doi: 10.1007/s00345-013-1052-0. Epub 2013 Mar 17.